Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Prorogue then intimidate

By David Flint - posted Friday, 31 December 2010


The Governor

The question is being asked whether the Governor should have granted the request. Constitutionally there will be occasions when  advice to prorogue should be considered by the Governor under her reserve powers, that is where her decision is her own.

Such an occasion would arise if the Premier were seeking to close down the Parliemant to avoid a vote of no confidence. This arose in Canada in 2008, where the Governor General exercised her powers in favour of the Prime Minister after a two hour meeting at Rideau Hall, her official residence.

Canadian precendent

There the minority government of the Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper PC MP, had been threatened with a vote of no confidence on the floor of the House of Commons.

Advertisement

The opposition Liberal and New Democratic Parties had signed an agreement to form a coalition government, and the Bloc Québécois has agreed to support the coalition on confidence issues.

The session was prorogued by a Royal Proclamation, in both the English and French languages, made under the authority of the Canadian Crown on 4 December 2008. 

It was not for long at that time of the year, a factor which was no doubt taken into consideration by the Governor General in making her decision. The new session was to begin  on 26 January, 2009.

(For the text of the Proclamation and for more details, see this column:“Royal solution to the Canadian political mess: an Antipodean view” 7 December 2008.)

What the prorogation meant

The Proclamation was made not under a specific provision of the Canadian written constitution, the Constitution Act of 1867, nor under an act of parliament. It was made under the Royal Prerogative.

At the time I made four points:

First, if this is a crisis it is political, and certainly not constitutional. Indeed, rather than a crisis, it is more of a mess made by politicians acting instinctively as they do all around the world, attracted to the scent of and addicted to power.

Advertisement

Second, the Canadian Crown will play the key role in ensuring a constitutional solution to this crisis among the politicians.

Third, the powers of the Canadian Crown will be exercised by the Governor General ( no hyphen is used in Canada in contrast to the Australian Governor-General).

Fourth, the Governor General is above politics because of the crucial fact that she is appointed by, and owes her allegiance to the Sovereign - and through Her as a trustee for the people.  She does not owe any allegiance to the politicians who may have recommended her appointment, or to the particular party to which the politician belongs.  Nor is she a politican seeking her own reelction or obsessed by the ideas of mandate or political agenda.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Flint is a former chairman of the Australian Press Council and the Australian Broadcasting Authority, is author of The Twilight of the Elites, and Malice in Media Land, published by Freedom Publishing. His latest monograph is Her Majesty at 80: Impeccable Service in an Indispensable Office, Australians for Constitutional Monarchy, Sydney, 2006

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Flint

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Flint
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Australians for Constitutional Monarchy
 The formidable Fred Nile prevails: premier concedes
 Prorogue then intimidate
 The ‘Utegate’ affair and the constitution
 ETS: emissions trading scheme or energy tax swindle?
 Information and media manipulation par excellence
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy