Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is homelessness solvable?

By Gary Johns - posted Monday, 8 November 2010


Who are homeless?

Although the headline figure for homelessness is 16, 000 sleeping rough at any one time, the numbers are inflated to 105,000, with those who are in boarding houses, in supported accommodation, or are temporarily living with friends and family.

This definition of homelessness is strange; homeless are mostly defined by their housing solution! Does the "inflation" suggest that boarding houses, supported accommodation, and friends and family are no longer part of the solution? Indeed, the numbers in supported accommodation increased from 2001 to 2006, precisely because more funds were made available for such accommodation.

The idea that some are at risk of, but not actually, homeless is entirely valid. But the numbers invite the response that the sector is not sure of its solutions. For example, the 2008 National Youth Commission Inquiry into Youth Homelessness, published shortly after the government’s White Paper (bad timing to say the least), concluded that the government should give the sector a billion dollars, and come up with a strategy to solve youth homelessness! Muddy thinking indeed.

Advertisement

Accepting that the search for best remedies is on-going, it would be a powerful tool to have the market for homelessness broken down into its constituent parts, by cause and by remedy. The research would assess numbers of homeless according to cause and remedy, assess the effectiveness of each remedy, and then for each remedy assess cost, probability and timeliness of reducing homelessness. The existing data should be available to fill out the matrix in Table 1. Setting priorities in the homeless market.

The woman escaping her violent husband will have needs far different from those with mental health or substance abuse problems, different again from Aborigines living in remote areas with no economy to generate employment. But an honest assessment of the parts of the problem and the likelihood of a remedy for each (accepting that many will have multiple causes) may be a way to set priorities and "solve", that is reduce, homelessness.

Table 1. Setting priorities in the homeless market

Remedies

Causes of homelessness

Cost of remedy Probability of success Probability of success Timeliness of remedy
Affordable accommodation Low High (given right remedy) High (given right remedy) Fast
Domestic violence Medium Low Low slow
Unemployment Medium High High Fast
Mental health High Low to High (given the right remedy) Low to High Slow to fast
Substance abuse High Low Low Slow
Remote indigenous High Low Low Slow
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

Anyone who is interested in such research should contact Gary Johns by emailing him at Gary.Johns@acu.edu.au



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

21 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Gary Johns is a former federal member of Parliament and served as a minister in the Keating Government. Since December 2017 he has been the commissioner of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Gary Johns

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Gary Johns
Article Tools
Comment 21 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy