Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Hunger costs

By Lena Aahlby - posted Tuesday, 21 September 2010

As world leaders gather in New York to assess progress on the UN’s Millennium Development Goals (MDG), ActionAid’s report “Who’s Really Fighting Hunger?” has found that not only is the world going backwards on hunger targets, but also that Australia is failing it’s global responsibility.

ActionAid’s report reveals that hunger is costing poor nations US$450 billion a year - more than ten times the amount needed to halve hunger by 2015 and meet Millennium Development Goal One.

Fighting hunger is in other words ten times cheaper than ignoring it.


Even before the food and financial crises pushed hunger to unprecedented highs, malnutrition was the underlying cause of nearly 4.5 million child deaths every year. An extra 1.2 million children could die unnecessarily between now and 2015, partly as a result of setbacks in tackling hunger. Large as it is, the loss of life caused by hunger is dwarfed by the invisible and permanent loss of human potential. Childhood hunger causes irreversible damage to mental and physical capacity, cutting a person’s lifetime earnings by as much as 20 per cent and reducing overall economic output.

The report reveals that 20 out of 28 poor nations are off track to halving hunger by 2015 and 12 of these are going backwards. The hunger goal is going backwards globally largely because of a lack of aid to agriculture and rural development, few legal rights to food in poor nations and little or no support services to help farming communities when harvests fail.

The two regions which are home to the largest numbers of hungry people, South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, have lost the most ground in the wake of the food and financial crises. Nearly half of South Asian children remain malnourished, a situation little changed from 1990 - indefensible considering the region’s per capita income has tripled in the same period. In Sub-Saharan Africa, just under a third of the total population was chronically hungry by 2009 - up by two percentage points, from 30 per cent in 2006. Worst of all, food security is predicted to deteriorate further in Africa, to the point that nearly 50 per cent of Africans could be going without enough food by 2020.

But the report also found that global hunger can be reduced, with Brazil, China, Ghana, Malawi and Vietnam slashing hunger by dramatically scaling-up investment in small farms and introducing social protection schemes such as public works employment, cash transfers, food rations, and free school meals. Malawi has reduced the number of people living on food hand outs from 1.5 million to 150,000 in just five years while Brazil has halved the number of underweight children in less than 10.

How have some governments, including some in very poor countries of the world, managed to tackle hunger and poverty so effectively, whereas others have failed? And why are some governments and the world not doing more?

By investing more in local agriculture, governments can feed their people and also regenerate rural economies. Recent research has pointed to the vital role that agriculture played in China’s initial take-off. Agriculture was estimated to have contributed to poverty reduction four times more than growth in manufacturing or service sectors. As China’s story demonstrates, the biggest impact on reducing hunger and poverty is achieved when governments focus on supporting the small-scale farmers who grow the majority of staple foods consumed locally. There are particularly massive gains to be reaped from investing in women farmers, who currently receive hardly any credit or extension advice and seldom enjoy secure rights over land.


Safety nets are also important to help small farmers keep planting and harvesting through tough times, avoiding the distress sales of livestock and land that so often push vulnerable families over the brink into chronic hunger and destitution.

Brazil has expanded welfare coverage dramatically in recent years. Increases in the minimum wage and a national cash transfer program have been introduced alongside subsidised credit and procurement programs that support smallholder farmers. Taken together, these measures are widely recognised as having a phenomenal impact on reducing Brazil’s once infamous inequalities - with child hunger rates slashed by over 50 per cent in little over 10 years.

Rich countries need to live up to their many promises to increase financing for agriculture in the developing world. Australia performs poorly by international standards, providing less than one third of its fair share of overseas aid to agriculture and food security.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Lena Aahlby is the Director and Founder of StrategyforChange, a consultancy that works with the not-for-profit sector on strategy development, campaign design, training and capacity building. Lena has extensive experience of working with NGOs both in Australia and internationally, most recently in her capacity as International Programme Director for Greenpeace at the global HQ in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Please see for more.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Lena Aahlby
Related Links

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy