Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Politics for a Facebook world

By Samantha Stevenson - posted Monday, 30 August 2010


Suddenly advertising political brands in our News Feed was a democratic act, allowing us to self-represent particular political interests in turn.

Because everyone knows that who we are on Facebook isn’t “real”. It’s a collection of individual self-representations, where we construct “profiles” of ourselves to be consumed and commented on by others.

The sad thing is that in an election devoid of any political difference we are left only with the transcendental, which manifests as an apolitical choice equivalent of “liking” one Facebook profile over another.

Advertisement

The homogeneity of the effectively bipartisan policy offerings is much more condemning of the ALP than the Liberal party. Abbott did not betray the history of his party or the principles of conservatism in what he promised the Australian people. He remained loyal to his brand.

But the ALP's continuing step-to-the-right is a massive betrayal of the progressiveness that historical forces tell us they are meant to offer. The only “closing the gap” they’ve been doing is between themselves and the Liberal party, both in policies and - unintentionally, no doubt - votes.

The ALP, it appeared, hoped that Gillard herself would represent the appeal of progressiveness her policies didn't, and this alone would be enough to satisfy voters, or at least distract us. So the Gillard-sign was meant to signify difference and progressiveness relying on her gender, union-lawyer past, atheism, an association with the history of the ALP brand (cue Bob Hawke, stage Left), and ultimately the fact she was not-Abbott. The “real Julia”, it turned out, was nothing more than simulacrum.

Which isn’t her fault alone. She inherited this history of politics-by-symbolism that was part of Rudd’s initial appeal. The uncritical romanticism surrounding Rudd apologising to the Stolen Generations and signing Kyoto has done nothing to improve the lot of our Indigenous population or produce real action on climate change. Important gestures, yes: real politics, no. The ALP sells summits and citizens’ assemblies so we can talk about change, rather than offering change itself.

It’s politics for a Facebook world. And who will ever forget that Rudd - who only months ago was uber celebrity Prime Minister with unprecedented popularity ratings - could be deposed of as quickly and as easily as deleting a Facebook friend.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Samantha Stevenson teaches in cultural studies at Curtin University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Samantha Stevenson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy