Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The future is in our hands: Reconciliation direction 2001

By Pat Thompson - posted Thursday, 31 August 2000


While he may be consistent, there is no question in my mind that the hundreds of thousands of Australians who walked across Sydney Harbour bridge, and around the country, voted with their feet. Voted for a new deal for our peoples. Clearly, the informed public debate has moved on. Mr Howard has not.

To be fair, I must also say I believe he has come to accept that ATSIC has helped to considerably "improve the lot" of our constituents over the past decade. He has certainly made it clear to the ATSIC Board that he is happy to work with us to make crucial improvements in the health education, employment and essential services of our peoples.

What he terms "practical" reconciliation. And we are happy to work with him to deliver these improvements.

Advertisement

But he also knows, as I do, there is simply not enough money currently being allocated to these areas.

ATSIC has also made it equally clear to him that we want him to work with us to deliver true reconciliation.

At Corroboree 2000 ATSIC called on all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to unify behind our struggle for true reconciliation. This means recognising that we possess distinct rights arising from our status as first peoples, our relationships with our territories and waters, and our own systems of law and governance.

We called for a new era of informed constitutional consent.

It must be always be remembered in this debate that we have never given such consent at any stage in our history. I repeat, there have been no treaties, no formal settlements, no compacts. We are not mentioned in the constitution.

But let's make on thing clear: we do not seek this to divide the nation, but to unite it.

Advertisement

I think it is quite clear on the question of the treaty, and indeed on many Indigenous issues, this nation already is divided. It is my view and that of ATSIC - and I must say many other Indigenous leaders outside of ATSIC - that a treaty can unite the nation.

Clearly, what Prime Minister Howard and his conservative bedfellows are up to is to whip up hysteria over our pursuit of a treaty. In so doing they use the narrowest definition of the word.

They claim it is a document signed between two separate nations.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All

This is an edited extract of a speech given at the Nundah Community Centre on August 8, 2000.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Pat Thompson is ATSIC commissioner for Brisbane.

Related Links
ATSIC homepage
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy