Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Punishing poverty

By Joel Tozer - posted Thursday, 8 July 2010


It found that compared with store sales 18-months before Income Management, the scheme “had no beneficial effect on tobacco and cigarette sales, soft drink or fruit and vegetable sales”.

Within its findings, the report states: “… our study showed that across 10 stores in the NT, income management had no effect on fruit and vegetable sales or turnover, contrary to results reported in official reports. The average daily turnover of fruit and vegetables throughout the 18-month income-management period was about 152gm per person.”

Senator Rachel Siewert of the Greens said the government’s current evidence is based on poor consultation.

Advertisement

“Their evaluation process is this: ‘Let’s ask the people who are already subject to income quarantining whether they think their kids have put on weight or are eating more.’ When half of the 76 people they have asked - of the over 15 [and a half] thousand people who are quarantined - say yes, that means that income management is working,” Senator Siewert told the Senate (PDF 963KB) last Monday night, an hour before the bill was passed.

Irrespective, the government has allocated $410 million over five years to manage the 20,000 welfare recipients, which equates to approximately $5,000 per person income-managed, each year: or ten times what that person would receive to help them get a job.

Currently, Income Management applies to all people under 25 who have been on welfare for more than three months or people over 25 on welfare for a year.

Head of the Sole Parent’s Union Kathleen Swinbourne said she is concerned about the new policy direction. “There is a great deal of Australian and international research that shows that the more impositions you put on people, and the more you reduce their autonomy, the worse the outcomes for them and their children.

“This legislation appears to be punishing people for being poor, rather than helping them to run their own lives and care for their families,” she said.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Joel Tozer is a Sydney-based freelance journalist.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Joel Tozer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Joel Tozer
Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy