Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Mining rents and ‘super profits’

By Aynsley Kellow - posted Tuesday, 11 May 2010


Finally, rising expectations with respect to environmental and social performance by the industry have increased the costs and lengthened the lead times for bringing new capacity into production. These measures have largely been supported by the large players in the sector, not just because it is the right thing to do, but because it makes good business sense. Making it harder for juniors and artisanal miners to bring capacity into production has kept the supercyle going for longer because it has inhibited the factors that have traditionally clipped the peaks off cycles.

There have been defences of the policy, some coming from the union officials who should be questioning the policy in the interests of their members, that have reflected the outmoded assumption that because the resources are not mobile and are located in Australia, the miners will have no option but to get on and pay the tax.

It is true that natural resources are not mobile, but capital is, and in a world where there are plenty of opportunities for investment, decreasing the likely returns in Australia will inevitably shift investment.

Advertisement

Australia is unique among the markets of the developed world. Mining has recently usually accounted for around 20 per cent of the value of the ASX. The closest comparator is Canada, where the percentage is around only a quarter of that.

A shift in those relativities has begun. The use of the language of “super profit” for domestic political consumption has not helped.

Unless the government addresses these issues, the increase in the Superannuation Guarantee - itself a good idea - will do nothing to offset the losses in all our superannuation investments resulting from the misapplication of an inherently good policy.

The government can save the situation by changing the trigger, dropping retrospectivity and perhaps graduating the rate to make it progressive. But that will require that it acknowledge its error.

This measure might not even be smart politics. Superannuation guarantee has made us all at least petit capitalists, with a stake in the profitability of business. In addition, substantially more of us are direct shareholders than are trade union members.

Taxing a sector that represents a fifth of the value of the stock market as if earnings greater than the government bond rate might not be as popular as its architects think. Nor is taxing economic rent at too high a rate necessarily good policy, as a simple example shows.

Advertisement

In 2009, BHP Billiton earned $2.47 a share, but paid only $1.01 in dividends. It remains a growth play, rather than a yield play, because the difference was invested in developing new mines and oil resources. Would it be better public policy to have invested more of margin in more insulation or more COLAs for schools under the rhetoric of an education “revolution”?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Aynsley Kellow is Professor of Government at the University of Tasmania, and Chair of the Politics and Business Research Committee of the International Political Science Association. He has published widely on environment and resource and is completing a project on the international organisation of the mining industry. He holds shares in mining stocks, both directly and through his superannuation.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Aynsley Kellow

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Aynsley Kellow
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy