Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Time for a breath of fresh air

By Richard Denniss - posted Friday, 30 April 2010


The first thing we need to do is so simple that it has been completely ignored: we need to ban the construction of new coal-fired power stations until the ‘clean coal’ optimists can actually show us that they can deliver. Coal-fired power stations last for fifty years and it is inconceivable that any meaningful vision of a ‘low carbon economy’ includes more of them. Delta Electricity is currently considering a big coal-fired station in NSW.

Then comes a carbon price. While it’s clear that we need one as soon as possible, it’s not clear what that price should be. But the beauty of a carbon tax compared to an emissions trading scheme is that it is easy to design complementary policies, such as investments in energy efficiency, public transport and renewable energy, to augment the impact of a carbon tax. Perversely, under the CPRS the more that state and federal governments invested in such ‘complementary measures’ the more spare permits became available for expanding the output of the big polluters.

Finally, the next scheme should show some real leadership on the international stage by putting serious money on the table to help encourage the developing countries to act.

Advertisement

Back before the CPRS took the wind out of the community it was common sense to believe that early action was cheaper than delayed action. And back before anyone had heard of ‘emission intensive trade exposed industries’ it was patriotic to believe that Australia should lead the world, not lag it. If we are to tackle climate change, we need to get back to where we were before the CPRS knocked our enthusiasm. We need to remind ourselves what we need to achieve, and assure ourselves that we can achieve it.

The question for the Rudd Government now is, is it willing to fight for good climate change policy, or was it simply using climate change policy to cause a good fight?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article first appeared in The Canberra Times on April 28, 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

27 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Richard Denniss is Executive Director of The Australia Institute and an adjunct associate professor at the Crawford School of Economics and Government, Australian National University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Richard Denniss

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 27 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy