Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Chinese Language Teaching in Schools - Australia, USA and UK

By Jane Orton - posted Monday, 19 April 2010


  • creating a supply of Chinese-language teachers;
  • increasing the number and quality of school programs; and
  • developing appropriate curriculum, materials, and assessments, including technology-based delivery systems.

As Australian schools are once again being urged by the Federal government to develop Asia literacy, recent developments in the United States and the United Kingdom show that this time round, Australia is not alone in the endeavour. Indeed, from the perspective of one involved in the teaching of Chinese in Australia, the experience of reading the above paragraph from a report by the New York based Asia Society produces a strong sense of déjà vue and the desire to cry, “Snap!” Yet, in fact, with its organized body of trained and registered teachers, its developed, integrated curricula, resources and assessment procedures K-12, and its nationally networked programs of professional development, Chinese volunteer aids, sister schools and in-country sojourns, in the teaching and learning of Chinese in schools, comparatively, Australia is clearly miles ahead of both the UK and the US – for the time being.

The list of aspirations and imperatives to develop Chinese, and the list of obstacles and laments about developing it well, coming from the US and UK suggest the huge potential for mutual benefit if we were to gather, distil and share what Australia knows about the teaching and learning of Chinese in schools and the training of Chinese teachers. But to do that we  would need to do some fast, rigorous work – our own teaching still leads to a 94 per cent drop out rate among classroom learners, which is hardly export quality! The key to reducing that is better teacher education; more time on task than other languages, as Chinese requires; and above all, finding the way to ensure that, as a right, all students accepted into senior year Chinese have a rich educational course to follow, and examinations in which all the diligent and able can anticipate being highly successful.

Advertisement

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Jane Orton co-ordinates Modern Languages Education in the Melbourne Graduate School of Education.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jane Orton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy