Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Tasmania and the Swiss example

By Klaas Woldring - posted Wednesday, 14 April 2010


PR Open Party List system recommended strongly

Proportional representation voting (PR) is the main rival to the single-member district system. Among advanced western democracies it has long been the predominant voting system. For instance, in Europe, 21 of 28 countries use proportional representation, including Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.

Where new constitutions were introduced in the last few decades PR was mostly adopted and often enshrined in the constitutions themselves. This was the case in Portugal (1974), almost all of the countries behind the former Iron curtain in Eastern Europe (after 1991), the new South Africa (1996) and also in New Zealand.

Eighty per cent of the PR systems are "Party List". What it means is that the political parties present a list of candidates and the voters place ONE mark next to the party and a particular candidate (at the same time) to indicate the preference for their party AND the candidate (in the German and NZ systems, two votes are used to provide opportunity for a geographical/local candidate). There is a simple quota of votes to be achieved for a candidate to be successful. A party gains candidates in accordance with the number of times it achieves the quota. Preferences for those who are not number 1 on the list are counted first towards such candidates. In this way candidates not highly preferred by the party can be elected as a result of voter preferences. There is no horse-trading here. It is simple, transparent and counted quickly.

Advertisement

High time for electoral change in Australia!

It is obvious that the major parties in Australia don't want to know about proportional representation because it would deprive them of seats and total control over the nation if they win an election. To achieve a break-through Independent candidates who favour proportional representation should group together and form an informal Alliance to promote this reform because Australia is caught in a vicious circle.

There are important national issues, which often cannot be dealt with effectively as a result of the current two-party system. Australia needs a circuit breaker. Perhaps a massive vote for Independents who favour proportional representation?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Klaas Woldring is a former Associate Professor of Southern Cross University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Klaas Woldring

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Klaas Woldring
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy