Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

A weak State in a mediocre performing country

By John Ridd - posted Wednesday, 14 April 2010


QSA have never done any assessment worth the name in Years 1 to 10. Their predecessor the QSCC never did any assessment whatsoever (see point 6). The fact is that there is no skill base at all within QSA relevant to Years 1 to 10 assessments.

There is general acceptance that the condition of education in Queensland is now poor. That acceptance arose because hard, verifiable data became known to more people. Consequent to that realisation there is strong general pressure for future information to be clearly stated; for methods to reach conclusions (e.g. assessments) to be explicit, numerate, expressed in suitable language and understandable to all without difficulty.

In these newish circumstances the approach of QSA, QTU and education faculties, who fancy themselves as progressive, avant-garde, looks and is passé: totally irrelevant to today. But they are a monstrously powerful and dangerous impediment to progress.

Advertisement

Unless the QSA has a “road to Damascus” experience, any implementation, oversight and assessment must not be entrusted to them. They and QSCC caused the problem and cannot possibly be part of the solution.

Only Parliament can stop QSA ruining the National Curriculum. The Premier, the leader of the Opposition, the Minister, the shadow Minister and all members of Parliament need to co-operate now.

Parliament could set up a new organisation for the purpose of implementation, oversight/assessment, but that would be expensive unless QSA were concurrently justly dismissed for gross incompetence.

Perhaps a Regulation could be inserted into the relevant Act to (a) set up a Moderation Committee answerable to Parliament alone; (b) change the name of QSA to include the word “Assessment” (as in some other States); (c) state that all syllabi/assessments now and in the future must meet the triple criteria: defined, reliable, validated; and (d) emphasise that those syllabi and assessments must be clear, readable and understandable to students, parents and to Parliament.

This is all far above the hurly burly of partisan politics. Parliament is our students’ last hope: it should act.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Ridd taught and lectured in maths and physics in UK, Nigeria and Queensland. He co-authored a series of maths textbooks and after retirement worked for and was awarded a PhD, the topic being 'participation in rigorous maths and science.'

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Ridd

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Ridd
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy