Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Making unhappy couples stay together causes more pain than divorce does

By Rohan Wolfers and Justin Wolfers - posted Monday, 15 December 2003


Interestingly, while the rise in divorce rates did closely coincide with legislative change, our analysis suggests that liberalised divorce laws were not responsible for any long-term change in divorce patterns.

State-to state-comparisons in the US show that, aside from a short run spike, legislative change had little to no affect on divorce rates. Indeed, the long-run rise in divorce was the result of broad social, cultural and religious change throughout the 1960s and 70s.

We ran similar tests to the state-to-state comparison on Australia and New Zealand (where unilateral divorce was only introduced in 1981). In both countries there was a short-run spike in the divorce rate in the years shortly after the reforms. However, this likely reflected the dissolution of a stored-up pool of failed marriages in which one spouse was trapped by fear, impoverishment or an inability to prove fault. Moreover, in the longer term, we found the legislation was responsible for only a very minor change in Australia’s divorce rate.

Advertisement

While society often bemoans the end of traditional family structures, reform needs to focus on improving bad marriages, rather than prohibiting healthy divorces. It must be remembered that a return to pre-1975 divorce regime would mean little more than a return to abuse and violence in the household.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The Sydney Morning Herald on 10 December 2003.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Rohan Wolfers is a Research Associate at OzProspect, a non-partisan public policy think tank.

Dr Justin Wolfers is an Assistant Professor of Economics at Business and Public Policy Department of the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Rohan Wolfers
All articles by Justin Wolfers
Related Links
Justin Wolfers's home page
Ozprospect
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy