Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Kevin, we need to talk about you

By Gary Johns - posted Thursday, 11 March 2010


For years the ACTU leadership has been based on public sector - mainly teachers union - officials whose experience is altogether different from those who deal with the private economy.

Those who remember the mining boom of the 1980s remember most the attitude that the workers should be as rapacious as the miners. The result was a short-lived boom and a wages breakout that started in the mining sector, which could afford it, and spread to all sectors of the economy, which could not. When the boom crashed, the resultant wages overhang and high unemployment took years to unwind.

We see clearly now that the global financial crisis was, for Australia at least, a brief interruption to a long-term resources boom and deeper engagement with China. It was not the end of capitalism, as essayist Rudd led us to believe. The time has come for a more serious consideration of how to set sail for growth.

Advertisement

The themes that Hawke brought to government - recovery (economic), reconstruction (infrastructure) and reconciliation (industrial) - were universal themes that could engage the workforce in an economic dialogue. The Rudd government has no language and no insight into economics.

This was always going to become a problem when economic management came to the fore. The burgeoning environmental agenda and, somewhat contrarily, the global financial crisis, clouded the path to ongoing reform of the Australian economy.

A seminal green paper from 1993, the Prime Minister's Committee on Employment Opportunities' Restoring Full Employment, posed a hard question: “Are we prepared to reduce constraints to business expansion, such as disincentives to hire people?”

This government has to come up with an answer to that question. Labor does not have to revisit incomes policies or trade union accords.

Those devices played their part but are no longer necessary. What is necessary is that workers and bosses can cut a deal keeping in mind the viability of the business in which they are engaged, not a business thousands of kilometres away in the Pilbara in northwest Western Australia or in the Surat Basin in southwest Queensland.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian on March 4, 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Gary Johns is a former federal member of Parliament and served as a minister in the Keating Government. Since December 2017 he has been the commissioner of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Gary Johns

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Gary Johns
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy