Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

A thief, me, and the PSB (Public Security Bureau)

By Brian Hennessy - posted Thursday, 13 August 2009


“Thank you for your assistance, gentlemen, My wounds need attending to, we are leaving.”

And as we departed, the insights gained from this unlikely spiritual experience were reinforced by the officer-in-charge when she collared my wife in the courtyard outside and once again asked her for personal information about her relationship with me. When my wife asked why was this information needed, the response was, “so that if we find the criminal we can contact you with this information”.

More lies. Anyway, how can you find a criminal you are not searching for?

Advertisement

What will happen now?

Causing loss of “face” to these officers will bring its own reaction. China has no cultural or spiritual tradition of forgiving and forgetting, so unfortunately for us, we can expect some kind of negative consequence.

Most likely we will be monitored for a while: technically (via email, telephone, etc) or perhaps physically (by undercover police) for any evidence that might support a self-serving, face-saving false report on this incident.

This is the way it works: implicate your victim first; find or manufacture enough circumstantial evidence to justify your implication; and in the process, advance your career. Standard procedure for police states everywhere.

What can I do about it?

Not much. All I can do is despise the dishonesty that pervades this regime from top to bottom, and pity those workers whose lives are trapped forever in subtle bondage to a sick system. Feudalism dies hard. Strong words, but that is how it has always been. Emperor or president, it has never been any different. This system has remained basically unchanged for 5,000 years.

Advertisement

In fact, Chairman Mao himself tried to get rid of it and failed. And as we know, his methods were brutal.

I give this regime two more generations. No more. Check what Marx himself had to say about unrestrained capitalism and undemocratic leadership.

From Brian in China (at the government's pleasure).

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brian is an Australian author, educator, and psychologist who lived in China for thirteen years. These days he divides his time between both countries.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Brian Hennessy

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Brian Hennessy
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy