Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Freedom of conscience, thought and religion - but perhaps not in Victoria

By David Palmer - posted Friday, 31 July 2009


In the third place, the Options Paper, as if stricken by amnesia, completely ignores the centuries old hard fought legal framework for freedom of religion.

The proposed amendments to sections relating to religious freedom will have a detrimental impact on the guarantee of religious freedom granted in another piece of state legislation - the Victorian Charter of Human Rights.

It is critical to understand that the Charter is the domestic manifestation of various UN documents previously alluded to. These documents bind Australia in conscience and often in law. SARC must consider the matters before it in the light of the full scheme of UN protection of religion. Additionally there may well be Federal legislation given under the Commonwealth’s external affairs power that parallel the existing exemptions.

Advertisement

Our contention is that if the proposed changes become law, freedom of religion will be diminished.

The UN makes it very clear that overwhelming need must be demonstrated before religious freedom is narrowed by any state.

There is nothing in the Options Paper presented by SARC that could possibly support such a need. These changes are strongly opposed as a matter of faith, human rights and the common law.

The State Government ought not to be considering meddling with international rights that are just about embedded in our DNA! A general outcry from all interested Victorians can arrest these changes.

These rights are important for all Victorians, whether Christian or Muslim, Jewish or of no faith. We must not allow our politicians to interfere with matters of faith (unless other issues of law are threatened). It becomes a very slippery slope indeed when governments bow into areas that have a clear “private property” sign up, particularly given s116 of the Australian Constitution, preventing the Commonwealth from prohibiting the free exercise of any religion.

If the changes are made, they will certainly be challenged by the Christian Church using all means at its disposal, including legal challenge and civil disobedience based on religious conscience. That this should be the case will be but a reflection of the depth of Christian feeling on these issues.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

20 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Palmer is a minister of the Presbyterian Church of Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Palmer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 20 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy