Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

President Barack Obama - trying to lead, but where?

By Terry Miller - posted Thursday, 26 March 2009


The US needs to restore growth. Other countries need to do the same. No doubt there can be some synergy in co-ordinated actions, but the fundamental decisions - government spending, tax rates, bank reserve requirements, the money supply - will be made domestically.

A government that acts intrusively and with market-killing borrowing, taxing, spending, or regulating can do a lot of harm. Governments doing such things co-operatively in a group like the G20 can do even more harm.

Some seem to believe that 20 governments meeting together may produce wiser policy than one government acting alone. It is, of course, at least as likely that a group like the G20 - whose members include societies ranging from free market to avowedly communist, and political systems ranging from democracy to despotism - will opt for a lowest common denominator that reflects not wisdom but rather banality and political expediency. The President's statement of March 24 would seem to point in that direction.

Advertisement

The devil is in the details

As in all government actions, it is only by seeing the details of what is actually done or not done that Americans will truly understand what is being proposed or enacted. For the US, it will be only when Americans see the details of any legislation that they will be able to understand where the President is setting the balance between economic growth and stability.

Those details are not forthcoming yet. Until they are clear, Americans should recognise the President's statement for what it is: a political declaration that temporises, leaving options open and avoiding real decisions. It is either the essence of statecraft or a fatal delay while the economy drifts. On the positive side, free marketers might even claim that it is a blessing in disguise that will give the economy time to begin to recover on its own. Time will tell.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published by The Heritage Foundation on March 24, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ambassador Terry Miller is Director of the Center for International Trade and Economics at The Heritage Foundation.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy