Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

A social democratic response to the Great Depression of 2008

By Ken McKay - posted Thursday, 19 March 2009


Australia must recognise that the utilising the enterprise model has failed and must embrace industry policy, not only in labour relations but also in providing the infrastructure to support business change.

This should not be mistaken to be a return to protectionism or as hand outs to inefficient business. Industry settlements in wage bargaining provide the vehicle for labour productivity improvements not only to flow through the industry for the settlement but to have a wider impact on the economy as a whole.

To illustrate this, in the early 1990s I was involved in enterprise negotiations for the brick manufacturing industry and one of the outcomes was changes in work practices that enabled significant energy cost savings. As these negotiations were on an enterprise level only one company accessed this benefit. Therefore this would have led to reduced input costs for the housing and construction in some markets, if there had been an industry-wide settlement this would have led to an industry-wide reduction of input costs.

Advertisement

Investment

Linked to the focus on industry as the vehicle for change, is the need to establish industry investment funds as a safeguard against the potential of a future collapse in the international finance sector or limited access to investment for Australian industry.

The funds would enable corporations to invest up to 20 per cent of pre-tax income in industry funds. The trustees would be representatives of the workforce and businesses in the industry.

There would be no tax on contributions, earnings or withdrawals. Individual corporations would have access to their contributions plus a default return rate equal to official interest rates plus 2 per cent.

To access their funds, the proposed investment would need to be for expenditure in Australia for the purpose of generating employment, investing in new capital, or research and development. As this fund enjoys tax free status, monies would not be available for corporate jets and the like.

Assuming a return at some point to normal investment returns, the funds would generate returns in excess of the guaranteed holdings for individual corporations. The funds would be required to keep an additional reserve to ensure liquidity, the excess would be available to support infrastructure associated with the industry.

This infrastructure could include supporting industry training, research and development and physical infrastructure that well assist the development of the industry.

Advertisement

Furthermore, we must never again allow the revenue from a resources boom to be wasted again. To this extent we need to replace the current royalty regimes with a resource rent tax administered by the Federal Government.

Essentially the current royalty regime of a flat rate/volume of mineral overtaxes small projects and undertaxes large projects. I refer to the ABARE paper for a full explanation of this situation.

The revenue from the resource rent tax would be placed into an investment fund. The states would be fully compensated for handing this power to the commonwealth with untied grants from the investment fund reflecting the revenue that they would have gained under the pre-existing royalty regime.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ken McKay is a former Queensland Ministerial Policy Adviser now working in the Queensland Union movement. The views expressed in this article are his views and do not represent the views of past or current employers.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ken McKay

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ken McKay
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy