Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

It's no contest - we need an ETS based on consumption

By Geoff Carmody - posted Tuesday, 16 December 2008


Is such a model complex? In Australia, it can use existing systems, including the existing Tax Invoice system, and the emissions data proposed by the Government in the Green/White papers.

As a bonus, all of the proposed messy, arbitrary, contentious, shifting, industry “carve outs” disappear. The model can be delivered to consumers on a real income-neutral basis. Only relative prices need change, with emissions-intensive product prices rising relative to others. That’s the signal required.

How much more complex is a production model? Just look at the detailed “carve outs” proposed in Australia. Check out the latest detailed “compromise” agreement of the EU on climate change policy.

Advertisement

It’s no contest. A production model is more inefficient and more ineffective. Globally, it won’t work.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Geoff Carmody is Director, Geoff Carmody & Associates, a former co-founder of Access Economics, and before that was a senior officer in the Commonwealth Treasury. He favours a national consumption-based climate policy, preferably using a carbon tax to put a price on carbon. He has prepared papers entitled Effective climate change policy: the seven Cs. Paper #1: Some design principles for evaluating greenhouse gas abatement policies. Paper #2: Implementing design principles for effective climate change policy. Paper #3: ETS or carbon tax?

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Geoff Carmody
Related Links
ETS or carbon tax? Paper #3
Implementing design principles for effective climate change policy. Paper #2
Some design principles for evaluating greenhouse gas abatement policies. Paper #1

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy