Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Our growing and groaning cities

By Brad Ruting - posted Thursday, 28 December 2006


These are issues we must face as a society. What will these developments be like in 20 years? Urban planning can shape our cities, help us embrace sustainability and alleviate inequalities. State governments might not always get it right in practice, but it’s a useful thing.

Urban planning does need to be less proscriptive in its approach, and more liberal. Suburbs and social systems need to develop organically, but we can still focus on the big picture. People must find their own meanings for the places in which they live and work, but we can help make development more equitable.

How can the government help? First, it should adopt a more holistic approach to planning. Don’t just mention economic, social and environmental considerations (that pervasive triple-bottom-line), but actually consider them. Healthy cities can be achieved with the right attitudes. Citizens should be shown the benefits of sustainable living. Ask yourself: Where do you want Australia to be in 20 years? What can we do today (not just tomorrow) to ensure we get there?

Advertisement

Second, governments must get the economic incentives right. Companies (and jobs) should be free to locate wherever they want, but tax breaks can help establish strategic zones. The distances that people travel to work need to be reduced, and more employment is needed in disadvantaged areas. These should be encouraged by making it profitable for business to help.

Finally, governments must be consistent. Sensible, balanced strategies should be applied to all parts of the city, not just bits when it suits. Don’t sell your soul to developers. Don’t forget transport, or the environment, or the bigger picture.

Are these suggestions vague and open to attack from vested interests? Yes. Nevertheless, we need to look into the future and set the right goals for our cities as they continue to grow. Australia needs cities that aren’t just economically competitive and ecologically sustainable, but cities that are socially alive, with minimal inequality and maximal liveability. Anything’s possible if we work together.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

32 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brad Ruting is a geographer and economist, with interests in the labour market, migration, tourism, urban change, sustainable development and economic policy. Email: bradruting@gmail.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Brad Ruting
Related Links
Griffith University Urban Research Program
Melbourne 2030: Planning for sustainable growth
NSW State of the Environment 2006 Report
Sydney Metropolitan Strategy

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 32 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy