Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Gambling with science policy

By Julian Cribb - posted Wednesday, 27 December 2006


Nor will the huge challenges Australia now faces in energy, water, sustainable food production, landscape degradation and species loss be solved by the present piecemeal attempts to commercialise R&D. If there is logic to public funding of research, it surely exists at this level - but science policy has, inexplicably, wandered off the pitch.

The Commission endorses the idea of the Rural R&D Corporations. These are one of the few really smart things Australia has done in science policy in the past 40 years and the mystery is why people keep wanting to close them, instead of cloning the model - a public dollar for a private dollar - in other sectors of the economy like energy, water, IT, communications, biomedical, sustainable production, environmental cleanup and so on.

A little startling was the Commission’s claim that government and industry agencies had apparently chorused “underfunding isn’t a problem”. Bulldust. Spend five minutes in any research institution in the country and you can soon find out otherwise. The current rejection of 80 per cent of ARC grant applications speaks volumes.

Advertisement

This is simply another manifestation of the cowing of Australian science. Everyone knows the penalty for speaking out is to be shot on Budget Night. The only reason the government has been able to maintain ineffectual science policy so long is that it has successfully hushed comment on it.

If scientists do not feel free to speak their minds on science, or on science policy, Australia is the loser. As a democracy we will be guided by fictions rather than facts in our public debate.

History is littered with nations which deceived themselves.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian on December 13, 2006.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Julian Cribb is a science communicator and author of The Coming Famine: the global food crisis and what we can do to avoid it. He is a member of On Line Opinion's Editorial Advisory Board.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Julian Cribb

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Julian Cribb
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy