Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Family Relationship Centres need review

By Arti Sharma - posted Tuesday, 28 November 2006


By agreeing to run FRCs under a national government badge and identity, with strict (but not fully developed) government guidelines, these organisations risk compromising their identity and independence by becoming simply an arm of government.

There is also the danger that organisations which do not get contracts to run FRCs could be "crowded out" of the relationships services sector by larger, well-funded, government-run service providers.

These centres are a classic case of the government extending its hand and adding another layer of bureaucracy to a system that is already structurally sound.

Advertisement

The amended Family Law Act makes it compulsory for some separating couples to attend counselling, before approaching the Family Court. This means that to satisfy the compulsory requirement, people will have to seek out these services. There is no need for government to take them over.

The Government, through the Family Relationship Services Program, already gives money to a large number of relationship services providers. Why can't money be spent to promote the existing independent services rather than spending $200 million to set up 65 new centres to duplicate what is already available?

Family Relationship Centres should have been trialled. In Britain, a wave of family law reforms were introduced in 2000, including a system of compulsory information meetings and mediation for separating couples before they accessed the court system. These meetings were rigorously trialled for 18 months and then scrapped, because they were expensive and ineffective in deterring couples from using the courts to resolve any differences.

With a one-year review just around the corner, and given the confusion surrounding the centres, the government should put off its plans to establish another 50 Family Relationship Centres. The first 15 should be comprehensively evaluated before any more are established.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Courier-Mail on November 21, 2006.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Arti Sharma is a policy analyst at the Centre for Independent Studies.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Arti Sharma

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Arti Sharma
Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy