Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

North Korean bomb test benefitting Bush?

By Peter Coates - posted Wednesday, 11 October 2006


In the end Bush will be grateful to North Korea and its leader for detonating the bomb at a most fortuitous time for the Republicans. North Korea may be gambling that Bush’s bluster will dampen down after this election. By then North Korea, now officially in the nuclear club, will start to enjoy some subtle recognition from the US. This latter theory is, of course, speculative and unkind. But as the West discovered with Mao and Stalin, communist dictators (and some Western leaders) can be decidedly cynical and opportunistic.

Effect of sanctions and a quarantine

If there has been a successful nuclear test it means it is too late to tell North Korea not to build nuclear weapons: in terms of standard non-proliferation policies the “horse has bolted”. The chances of North Korea destroying or handing over any or all of its nuclear weapons are remote.

International pressure on North Korea to cease or slow down development of miniturised nuclear weapons (more deadly because they can be placed on missiles or fast jets) is highly unlikely to be effective. North Korea may play at extended negotiations but its track record of bowing to such pressure is poor.

Advertisement

Given most trade and aid to North Korea is from China and South Korea (via land borders), a naval stop and search program is likely to have little effect, however decisive the sight of US naval vessels (for example, aircraft carriers) looks.

Chinese actions are likely to be the key. China is North Korea’s largest trading partner and probably the largest aid donor. North Korea relies on Chinese fuel, oil and food in particular. If China chooses, it could compensate for any reduction in aid from South Korea and other countries brought on by UN sanctions. No doubt China wants a stable North Korea first, not one that is an even more starving and unstable. Hence UN sanctions may be effectively foiled by China’s assessment of the situation and actions.

Russia may perceive political gain from being seen as “conciliatory” towards North Korea, its old Korean War ally. Much has changed since then but an unstable North Korea does not make a good immediate neighbour. And there are opportunities for Russia to score points against the “forever aggressive West”.

South Korea may be highly responsive to a UN sanction call as it needs all the international support it can get. South Korea and Japan are the most vulnerable targets for North Korea’s nuclear weapons and so have the most to fear. They would prefer a stable North Korea and may only hope to dampen the mixed expressions of jubilation and antagonism emanating from North Korea.

The US fears a regional arms race partly because this may mean a nuclear armed (and otherwise militarily self-sufficient) Japan, in as little as five years. The US's nuclear protection and arms sales have been of great assistance to the US in reducing its balance of trade difficulties with Japan. The nuclear arming of Japan would remove that dynamic.

Looking more broadly, the US is concerned that North Korea may ignite World War III by playing with nuclear fire. Hence America and the other nuclear powers are concerned if not alarmed.

Advertisement

All in all, October 9, 2006 was a sad day for all if the test is authentic. Countries like Japan, Taiwan and Australia are, no doubt, already considering their own nuclear weapons options. A new regional arms race looks set to start.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was originally posted by the author on Spooky Pete on October 9, 2006.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Coates has been writing articles on military, security and international relations issues since 2006. In 2014 he completed a Master’s Degree in International Relations, with a high distinction average. His website is Submarine Matters.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Coates

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter Coates
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy