Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

UN reform calls for strong resolution

By Syed Atiq ul Hassan - posted Friday, 25 August 2006


The heavy use of the veto power by Russia and the US has actually discredited the Security Council, as the threat to use it often tones down draft resolutions. For example, in the run-up to the Iraq war in March 2003, France and Russia indicated they would not support a new resolution sanctioning war.

Consequently, the US, the UK and Spain withdrew their draft resolution, and the US and its allies went to war without specific UN support.

The US regularly exercises its veto to shield the Israeli Government from international criticism, or any attempts to restrain the behaviour of Israel’s military.

Advertisement

The UN and its affiliated bodies have done significant and useful humanitarian, economical and social development work, and have also acted adequately on natural and human-made disasters. But, if a nation’s security and basic rights are humiliated, the UN is unable to maintain peace and stability.

Unfortunately, as far as peace and security are concerned, the veto has served only served the interest of the superpowers since the UN’s creation.

According to the Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, and adopted by the International Law Commission of the United Nations in 1950, planning, preparing, initiating or waging a war of aggression - or in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances - is a war crime punishable under international law.

Furthermore, the UN Charter requires that:

All the members of United Nations shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means...War can be used but only as a last resort and only under the direction of the UN Security Council.

Of the five permanent Security Council members, the US especially is the most vocal on the control of dangerous weapons, not hesitating to take aggression against any nation found to be developing nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction.

Advertisement

In the name of demolishing Saddam Hussein’s WMDs, the US and its partners sidestepped the Security Council and attacked Iraq.

Weapons inspectors were searching for WMDs in Iraq, and most nations were against any hostile action at the time, including a military attack on Iraq. A minority in the Security Council was also trying to pass a resolution to have Saddam Hussein disclose and destroy his WMD sites.

As events unfolded, this was clearly not what the US and its partners wanted. Their agenda was to topple Saddam Hussein and control Iraq, and to achieve this, the US could not wait for the Security Council resolutions, which might never have passed due to other veto-bearers.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

Article edited by Allan Sharp.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Syed Atiq ul Hassan, is senior journalist, writer, media analyst and foreign correspondent for foreign media agencies in Australia. His email is shassan@tribune-intl.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Syed Atiq ul Hassan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy