Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Floating gently on a waft of edu-dribble

By John Ridd - posted Tuesday, 6 June 2006


With the rise in the influence of (mainly) university-based education academics all of those three basic requirements were weakened. When the Board of Senior Secondary Schools Studies was abolished and replaced by the Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) what had been a slow decline became a Gadarene leap into disaster.

The newest syllabi are hopelessly short on detail of material and concepts to be studied. Wide variations in what, for example “physics” means from one school to another are inevitable. There is effectively no guidance on the content to be taught.

The QSA knows this and considers it to be quite acceptable, if not actually desirable. It is an exercise in futility to worry about differences between Bowen and Bunbury when we already have the potential for huge differences between Bowen and Biloela.

Advertisement

With the rise of “assignments” as both the central teaching approach and for the assessment of results, it is certain that nobody, either panellist or student, can know for certain whose work they are looking at. (Even universities have now realised that students cheat.) Of course they will cheat, they will get “help” from any source available - mother, father, uncles, aunts and so on - and get rewarded for their cheating.

That simple idea still eludes the QSA and their ilk. I once read a piece of “learned” work about this problem. The conclusion of much talk was that the longer the student had to do an assignment the less valid it was! Really? Fancy that.

Although not directly relevant to the assessment issue, it may be of interest to observe that as a consequence of the endless and unbroken series of assignments there is very little actual teaching taking place in many subjects. Mathematics, physics, chemistry and to a substantial extent biology seem to be the exceptions - for now.

Because the modern Queensland assessment “system” is non-numerical the “methods” to estimate final student results are vague, wordy and depend on “overall judgment”. The student has no idea whatsoever as to the relative importance of a piece of work. Hence they are playing a game, a very serious game, but they do not know what the rules of that game are. That is a scandal

Bear in mind that the abortion that is now assessment in Queensland in Years 11 and 12 follows three years of lower secondary schooling for which there has been no valid assessment now for nigh on 20 years. None whatsoever.

The basics that made the Queensland assessment system so good years ago were syllabus clarity, certainty that assessed work was that of the student alone and a transparent system to reach the final result. None of those characteristics now exists in Queensland.

Advertisement

The thrust of the Australian Certificate of Education concept is that there should be a nationwide certificate that would be acceptable everywhere. For any state to agree to being involved it will want to be certain that an ACE emanating from all the other states will be based on syllabi and assessment systems that are defined, reliable and valid. Current structures in Queensland fail completely to meet those requirements.

Gresham's law is that bad money drives out good. Feeble reliability of an ACE issued in just one state will drive down the validity of ACEs issued in all other states. It is unlikely that any state will agree to join a system that will degrade the standing of its own certification.

The syllabi and assessment systems - if the current mess can be called a system - has been spawned mainly by the Queensland Studies Authority. It is the organisation that has been charged with reviewing the Year 11 and 12 syllabuses. So Caesar is judging Caesar. There are a number of people within QSA that do have some connection with reality, but the organisation as a whole floats gently on a waft of edu-dribble. QSA has smashed an adequate system. It is hence psychologically and intellectually unable to make the radical changes that are needed: it neither believes nor thinks that there are monstrous problems.

In terms of student assessment Queensland has moved from excellence to lunacy, from penthouse to cellar.

How are the mighty fallen.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Ridd taught and lectured in maths and physics in UK, Nigeria and Queensland. He co-authored a series of maths textbooks and after retirement worked for and was awarded a PhD, the topic being 'participation in rigorous maths and science.'

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Ridd

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Ridd
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy