Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The spiritual shortcomings of the God of the scientist turned theologian

By Peter Sellick - posted Thursday, 3 July 2003


The target of my criticism includes all general belief in God, all easy theism that is disconnected from the life of the church and the scriptures it celebrates. This god, like the god of the scientist/theologian, (I think the order is correct) conveniently soothes our worst fears that the universe is cold and unknowing and there is no one out there who eternally cares.

Being "out there" is a quality of this god who is cut off from the events of human history even in spite of the attempt to allow this god elbow room, via the indeterminacy of quantum mechanics, to break the natural law and produce miracles. This indeterminacy may be fine for sub-atomic particles but here at the level of human life, objects continue to fall if unsupported, dead bodies stay dead, much to our horror, and people who attempt to walk on water are in danger of drowning, or psychiatric assessment.

Here we discover part of the agenda. Finding elbow room for God to interfere with nature is an attempt to say that the miracles could have happened after all and intelligent people can, with a clear conscience, become bible-believing Christians. Much effort has been spent in apologetics to this end to counter the wholesale abandonment of faith by educated people who find that natural science, particularly Darwinian evolution, makes belief impossible. This is a mistake, since belief in miracles can be a barrier to faith because it substitutes the miraculous for an encounter with the living Christ through Word and Sacrament. Like natural theology it is a distraction from the main game. John's gospel is aware of this:

Advertisement

Now when he was in Jerusalem at the Passover feast, many believed in his name when they saw the signs which he did; but Jesus did not trust himself to them. (John 2:23,24).

It is obvious that the scientist/theologian/Templeton prize bandwagon will not lead to new theology but a shoring up of old-fashioned theism that borders on Deism and distracts us from the task at hand: being the church of God in this place. As Stanley Hauerwas says: "In a world without foundations, the only foundation is the church".

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Ian Spooner.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Sellick an Anglican deacon working in Perth with a background in the biological sciences.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Sellick
Related Links
Other articles by Peter Sellick
Peter Sellick’s home page
Photo of Peter Sellick
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy