Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia and the Asian balance

By Kaushik Kapisthalam - posted Friday, 31 March 2006


For instance, Australia has been willing to accept an American nuclear shield under the ANZUS treaty and does not restrict nuclear armed American vessels from using its territorial waters. The joint US-Australian facility in Pine Gap plays a crucial part in relaying early warning information to the US strategic nuclear forces. Given this, it would not be breaking the mould for Australia to explore nuclear avenues with India.

Clearly, there is an increasing number of areas where Australia can engage India. However, engagement, especially of the strategic kind, is based on mutual trust. Indians have come to see nuclear accommodation as a touchstone of bilateral relationships. This is why Australia needs to find ways to take part in a US-led global nuclear rapprochement with India. The Indo-US nuclear deal provides an excellent pathway for this. The deal is basically another instance of a recent trend away from ageing and inflexible international treaties and towards a consensus of like-minded states led by the US, when it comes to resolving trans-national issues such as nuclear proliferation. The enthusiastic support for the deal from Mohammed ElBaradei, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, is an indicator that this shift is not transitory.

Indian leaders will definitely understand if Australia takes some time to reconcile to the Indo-US nuclear arrangement. However, they will definitely not take kindly to Australian reading from NPT scriptures to Indians even as Canberra bends over backwards to supply uranium to China with laughable provisions that pass for safeguards. As seen from New Delhi, a global “coming to terms” with India’s nuclear status is inevitable and the level of India’s trust with Australia depends on when Canberra boards the bus.

Advertisement

Building such ties with India is not going to damage Australian engagement of China. While the People’s Republic perceives India as a competitor, it also understands that its trading partners cannot be expected to abandon other rising economic powers. The Chinese will continue to trade and invest with Australia to the extent they are allowed. India itself is not actively pursuing containment against the PRC. It has pursued peace with China for over 20 years despite Chinese nuclear support to Pakistan and Zhongnanhai’s unwillingness to make real concessions on the border dispute.

What India is doing now is simply what all democracies do when faced with long-term issues - keep all options open. India is building options that are meant to communicate to China that genuine peace and friendship are cheaper than antagonising New Delhi. Indian democracy has also resulted in India merely building a handful of nuclear weapons every year when it has the capacity to build a hundred or more.

India is basically asking Australian policymakers the same type of things the Americans seek. Both want Australia to not let a commerce-led geopolitical inertia determine its China and Asia policy. While Australia makes moves hoping that China would indeed have a “peaceful rise”, hope is not a policy. Canberra would be wise to develop choices for both itself and Beijing.

Close strategic ties between Australia, India and the US would give the Chinese a clear cut choice between the benefits of conciliation and accommodation on one hand and the dangers of belligerence and overreach on the other. As a friend and a key trading partner, Australia would then do well to steer China towards choices that make the region and the world safer.

As with any period involving rising powers, we are seeing a strategic paradigm shift today. Indians certainly hope that Australia would welcome India’s rise as opposed to sticking to patronising comments on curry and cricket while vainly trying to prop up the antediluvian order of yesterday.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

18 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Kaushik Kapisthalam is a US-based commentator on South Asia issues with a focus on defence and strategic affairs. He is a member of the International Institute of Strategic Studies and writes regularly for United Press International, Defense News and Asia Times. He can be reached at contact@kapisthalam.com

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kaushik Kapisthalam

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kaushik Kapisthalam
Article Tools
Comment 18 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy