Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Were the US military really dominant in Iraq? Or were they not really tested?

By Peter McMahon - posted Friday, 13 June 2003


If this story is true, then of course the Iraqi war was not a true test of the new military technologies. The point the old soldiers in the US military made was that a desperate enemy is capable of finding ways around the technological advantages. If the best of the Iraqi forces were held back, then the new weapons and tactics were not fully tested at all.

So maybe this particular story - of unassailable US military power - is not true. Maybe if the US was to come up against a genuinely committed enemy - like, for instance, the North Koreans or Iranians - they might get a nasty surprise.

A quick, easy victory was crucial to the way Bush, Blair and Howard deflected opposition to the war on Iraq. Furthermore, in the aftermath of the war - and with the general impression of US invincibility - the US has already exploited its apparent dominance by threatening long-term irritants Syria and Iran. And the US public seems quite happy about this new aggression, as long as the costs seem so low.

Advertisement

However - and leaving aside the point that the war in Iraq, like that in Afghanistan, is hardly over in any meaningful sense - a few setbacks in the next "preventative" operation, a few too many body bags, and that aggression will start to look like something else.

Perhaps another story will emerge - that technology can never remove the danger of war, and that sooner or later the public will stop believing in grand plans for unchallenged geopolitical power. Actually, this sounds like the story that eventually became so popular about Vietnam, doesn't it.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Peter McMahon has worked in a number of jobs including in politics at local, state and federal level. He has also taught Australian studies, politics and political economy at university level, and until recently he taught sustainable development at Murdoch University. He has been published in various newspapers, journals and magazines in Australia and has written a short history of economic development and sustainability in Western Australia. His book Global Control: Information Technology and Globalisation was published in the UK in 2002. He is now an independent researcher and writer on issues related to global change.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter McMahon
Related Links
Murdoch University
Other articles by Peter McMahon
US Central Command
Photo of Peter McMahon
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy