Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

There is no need for a Chicken Little response - Medicare reform is needed

By Russell Schneider - posted Friday, 9 May 2003


What they ignore is that removal of the rebate would drive millions of people out of the health insurance system, forcing up prices and driving even more onto the public sector.

This would, of course, strengthen the role of public-sector unions representing doctors, nurses and everyone else in the health-care system and make it easier for them to squeeze future governments (and their taxpayers).

Is it too cynical to ask whether that's what all the fuss is really about?

Advertisement

Subject to any analysis, the federal government's package is a sensible and constructive one that deals in an equitable way with current and foreseeable future health system problems.

Australia, like the rest of the world, faces problems funding the health care needs not just of an ageing population but a world in which technology makes it possible to offer treatments hitherto unimaginable - but at continually escalating prices. As the recent SARS scare showed, nature is also capable of throwing up hitherto unimagined illnesses which will, of themselves, stretch the capacity of the health care system AND taxpayers to fund it.

In these circumstances a rational and compassionate society will ensure that its resources are directed to those most in need, while mobilising the capacity of the more fortunate to take some of the financial responsibility for their own care. Importantly, too, it will ensure that those on lower incomes are offered an opportunity, if they wish to use it, to access private treatment options as well as public ones. The 30 per cent rebate performs this task admirably.

The alternative is rationing public-sector treatments. We all know who will lose out then. And it won't be those who can afford to buy their way around the system. A black market in health-care services is the worst possible solution to our society's problems, and the sooner the opponents of sensible reform realise that the better.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

Article edited by Sue Cartledge.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Russell Schneider GAICD was CEO of the Australian Health Insurance Association from 1983 to 2006. Before that he was Canberra Bureau Chief and Political Correspondent for The Australian. He was a director of a major health insurer from 2006 until 2017.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Russell Schneider
Related Links
Australian Health Insurance Association
Department of Health and Ageing
Photo of Russell Schneider
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy