Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Give academic excellence a sporting chance

By Kevin Donnelly - posted Thursday, 7 April 2005


The Victorian education system is under review. In part, the purpose of the review is to ensure "the relevance of legislation to the contemporary education and training environment and that legislation supports the achievement of government policy objectives".

As acknowledged by Kosky, the original Education Act, enacted in 1873 and substantially revised in 1958, is no longer relevant and there is an urgent need to ensure the system successfully tackles today's challenges as well as the demands of the future.

To that end, if the Bracks Government is serious about education reform, it should not restrict itself simply to opening one elite sports academy. The alternative is to free the system from capture by education providers and to implement those overseas initiatives that have been proven successful.

Advertisement

Charter schools in the United States, where the centralised bureaucracy steps back and greater autonomy and control is given at the local level, have been proven to raise standards; especially in depressed, disadvantaged areas.

Private-public partnerships in Britain, where corporate and philanthropic groups take control of underperforming schools and where the school culture is one of excellence and success, have also led to higher standards.

If individual schools are to succeed, it is also vital that principals are given the power to hire and to fire staff, to deal with underperforming teachers and to reward those who achieve the best results.

Finally, given the diverse range of student interests, abilities and post-school destinations, it is no longer feasible to have a one-size-fits-all curriculum. Schools, in a general accountability framework, should be allowed to specialise and to offer a curriculum that best suits the needs of their communities.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Age on March 31, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Kevin Donnelly is a Senior Research Fellow at the Australian Catholic University and he recently co-chaired the review of the Australian national curriculum. He can be contacted at kevind@netspace.net.au. He is author of Australia’s Education Revolution: How Kevin Rudd Won and Lost the Education Wars available to purchase at www.edstandards.com.au

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kevin Donnelly

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kevin Donnelly
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy