Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The major parties have failed to deliver an energy policy that protects Australia

By Gareth Walton - posted Monday, 16 August 2004


The key question is whether these will contain anything of substance or just be existing policy re-launched or merely window-dressing.

The same day as the Prime Minister’s interview appeared, Mark Latham was reported in the media stressing the importance of climate change as an issue for Australia and repeating Labor’s long-held policy of ratifying Kyoto. 

The ALP’s commitments to ratify Kyoto, insert a greenhouse trigger in Commonwealth environment legislation, increase the renewable energy target to five per cent and in-principle support for emissions trading and greater energy efficiency measures mean the ALP’s climate policy is currently clearly more progressive than the Government’s.

Advertisement

However, despite this being the case, neither of the major parties current climate policies will protect Australia from climate change. They need to do more.

So what is needed to protect Australia from climate change – to prevent more frequent and severe droughts and bushfires and to save the Great Barrier Reef from coral bleaching and Australia’s ski fields from disappearing?

In what can often seem an overwhelming complex problem, the answer is refreshingly simple.

The latest science shows that Australia’s greenhouse pollution needs to be reduced by at least 60 per cent below 1990 levels by 2050 if Australia is going be protected from climate change.

It will require strong and visionary political leadership to get there. But it’s not impossible - the UK Government has already committed to such a target.

In the last Federal election campaign, the politics of climate change shifted quite dramatically when the ALP announced it would ratify Kyoto. The Prime Minister’s comments opened the door for further progress on this key issue.

Advertisement

Greenpeace calls on both major parties to commit to reducing greenhouse pollution by at least 60 per cent by 2050.

This is the measure by which they should be judged because it is the only one which will protect Australia from climate change.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Gareth Walton is a climate campaigner with Greenpeace Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Gareth Walton
Related Links
Greenpeace Australia Pacific
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy