Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Courting media attention with a half-baked idea

By Jennifer Clarke - posted Thursday, 25 August 2005


Academic celebrity can tempt academics to breach not just university codes of conduct as it’s alleged Fraser has done, but also some of the cherished conventions of academic life.

There is the temptation to speak well outside one's topics of expertise, even if colleagues could do so with more authority. (Provided one stays within a general field of expertise, the public won't know that the person down the corridor knows ten times as much about the particular issue.) There is an associated temptation to flog one's own books over better work by others.

There is the temptation to turn seminars, casual conversations with colleagues and the supervision of student research on topical issues into opportunities to prepare for one's next media briefing. There is the temptation to present established information from within one's own discipline as "news" because the public hasn't heard it yet, or hasn't heard it enough times.

Advertisement

There is the ever-present temptation to put one's name on what is really junior colleagues' or students’ work - justified in this case because one's own sheer celebrity is guaranteed to draw more attention to it than it might otherwise attract. And there is the temptation to focus more on converting one’s academic celebrity into some other kind of success (for example, in politics or the media) than on contributing to intellectual debate.

Who knows what Drew Fraser’s ideas are really based on, and what motivated him to voice them in the public domain. It’s hard to imagine these ideas shaping up better with more research, and even harder to imagine any responsible academic airing these things in the local rag without intending to turn over the dirty big rock that barely conceals Australia’s "white" supremacists. But let’s not pretend that Fraser is the only academic who’s courted way too much media attention for a half-baked idea.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Patrick O'Neill.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jennifer Clarke is a Canberra lawyer

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jennifer Clarke
Related Links
On Line Opinion - Academic martyrdom highlights university brain drain
On Line Opinion - The role of academics in a time of troubles
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy