Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Privileging prejudice: the threat and opportunity posed by the movement for 'religious freedom'

By Rodney Croome - posted Wednesday, 5 June 2019


In the traditional Enlightenment sense "religious freedom" meant not being disadvantaged because of one's faith: Think of how Catholics or Jews where once excluded from particular professions or clubs but are no longer.

Now "religious freedom" has come to mean the opposite; the legal right to disadvantage LGBTI people in the name of religion.

Under this new twisted definition of "religious freedom", the license to discriminate is only available to people who have a religious or conscientious objection to the requirements of anti-discrimination law. The rest of us still have to abide by that law.

Advertisement

There are often no objective tests for what a religious objection might be. The basis for claiming an exemption from anti-discrimination law is defined by the person claiming it, not the state or society and sometimes not even established denominations.

In almost every case, the act of discrimination, the refusal of services, the hate speech, or whatever sin is committed in the name of "religious freedom", is directed against LGBTI people.

There are some exceptions. In the US, "religious freedom" has been used to justify denying women termination services and in some states there is a debate about whether religious freedom laws allow discrimination against interracial couples.

But nowhere has a special claim for "religious freedom" been made by people advocating for refugees, defending the poor, or in any way helping others.

 

To all intents and purposes, "religion freedom" is not about religion or freedom. It is about giving special legal privileges to prejudice.

Advertisement

The term mocks all those defenders of genuine freedom who believe in democracy rather than theocracy.

It particularly mocks those people of faith for whom religion means love for others, not power over them.

Christians "thrown to the lawyers"

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rodney Croome is a spokesperson for Equality Tasmania and national advocacy group, just.equal. He who was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 2003 for his LGBTI advocacy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rodney Croome

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy