In the ESB letter, I can't find a 'yes' answer.
The ESB proposes:
- Finalising the details of the 'reliability guarantee' by end-2018.
- Implementation of the 'reliability guarantee' in 2019.
- Reliability standards should be, 'as defined by the Reliability Panel at the AEMC'.
Advertisement
The ESB advice says nothing about what reliability standards will apply.
There is no guarantee the existing NEM reliability standard will be retained, and, if not, no information about what might replace it.
2. Responsibility – the new word for sustainability (governments can prescribe, etc, standards here too, if they want to)
The words in the ESB letter about the 'emissions guarantee' boil down to arrangements, (finalised in 2018 and put in place in 2020), to ensure we meet our Paris Agreement commitments.
There's a 'lower energy intensity' flavour to the ESB words.
Australian carbon credit units (ACCUs) and 'international units', to be traded to meet 'responsibility' commitments, are mentioned in the letter.
Advertisement
The existing RET is 'grandfathered' to new investments (definition?) by 2020 ('tho, thanks to ex-PM Rudd, these attract RET benefits until 2030).
Could the NE'G' announcement itself induce a rush of new projects to beat the RET deadline, costing us all more?
There are some open-ended words: 'Once new investment under the RET finishes in 2020, the emissions guarantee on the retailers will require them to contract with low or zero emissions generators to meet their guarantee, but only where necessary to meet the emission reduction targets set by the Commonwealth. (Italics added.)
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
6 posts so far.