Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Real equality must frame marriage debate

By Martin Hanson - posted Wednesday, 27 September 2017


The voluntary, exclusive, lifelong relationship that involves the equality and union of both halves of humanity therefore represents the democratic principle itself. Only the equality of men and women can result in the actual human unity we describe as marriage. The most dramatic division in humanity becomes the source of its deepest unity.

Thirdly, the definition of marriage doesn't mention sex because the sexual unity of husband and wife cannot be understood separate from their overall personal unity - the free gift of the whole of their lives, including their future, to one another.

Aristotle said that the "barbarians" who treat women as slaves are themselves only fit to be ruled as slaves.

Advertisement

Only when sexual desire serves the common humanity of men and women and they are seen as equal persons, can human equality arise as a social principle. Look at other parts of the world today. Where women are suppressed, reduced to an appendage of a man or the State, or hidden from view, life is ugly and coarse, and democratic life is impossible. That changes when the law reflects the equality of the sexes in the unity of marriage, because it's the highest expression of human equality.

In marriage, husband and wife are a self-governing democracy, in and of themselves: different, equal, united. If there isn't a woman and a man in a marriage, it can't possibly reflect the equality of men and women, from which flows all other equalities, rights and freedoms. This is the real equality of marriage.

It is not only just, but necessary, for the political system founded on the principle that we are "all created equal", to recognise the inclusive nature of marriage between husband and wife above all other human relationships. This does not mean intolerance or hostility towards other relationships that exclude one biological half of humanity, as marriage is the very source of the right to domestic privacy that protects us all in our private lives. That right to privacy does not however mean that all our private actions should be recognised as exemplars of human equality.

Changing marriage will change our understanding of human equality and democratic principle, our highest common belief. The protection of Real Equality is the right reason to vote "No".

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Martin Hanson is a member of the Australian Labor Party and is the convenor of realequality.org

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Martin Hanson
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy