Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australian energy policy: getting the balance 'right'

By Geoff Carmody - posted Thursday, 15 June 2017


Trump's team talk about 'border tax adjustments' as part of his tax reforms.

WTO-compliant 'border tax adjustments' deliver trade competitiveness neutrality. And they're already here.

Hiding in plain view has been the value-added tax (VAT), or GST, to use the Australian label. Such tax design, using consumption-based emissions pricing, can do the job.

Advertisement

3. Letting technology leaders lead with 'no regrets' on trade competitiveness

We should encourage the march of technical progress. I hope Trump would agree.

Time, as well as policy not getting in the way, is needed to drive emissions and costs down while restoring reliability. The worst thing we can do is have a policy that politicians fight over, generating policy uncertainty, 'sovereign risk', and investment uncertainty.

I can't talk for the USA, but that's what we have, right here, right now. We are delivering 'the worst thing we can do' in Australia. It's a big 'own goal'.

4. Application of 'a better deal' comprehensively, not just to the USA

This stuff is not just for the USA. If it appeals to Trump, he can't oppose its application globally.

Advertisement

5. 'A better deal' must be a genuinely global deal: Australia 'going it alone' is ineffective at best

To argue that, unless we act (1.4% of global emissions), the Great Barrier Reef will die and the Opera House will be drowned is ridiculous. Australia should not cut off its economic nose to spite its employment face.

Assumingthere is a global warming problem, it needs a global solution. I hope Trump would agree.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Geoff Carmody is Director, Geoff Carmody & Associates, a former co-founder of Access Economics, and before that was a senior officer in the Commonwealth Treasury. He favours a national consumption-based climate policy, preferably using a carbon tax to put a price on carbon. He has prepared papers entitled Effective climate change policy: the seven Cs. Paper #1: Some design principles for evaluating greenhouse gas abatement policies. Paper #2: Implementing design principles for effective climate change policy. Paper #3: ETS or carbon tax?

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Geoff Carmody

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy