Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Andrew's government to deliver unemployment double whammy to Gippsland?

By Mark Poynter - posted Monday, 7 November 2016


In mid-October, with the ink barely dry on these draft proposals and mid-way through their public consultation phase, the Government suddenly adopted one of the draft proposals in announcing that it had directed VEAC to undertake a new investigation into the conservation values of State forests. This represents a disturbing subversion of due process seemingly to further a political agenda. Interestingly, the notice of this new investigation sits on the VEAC website alongside a photograph of a Leadbeater’s Possum.

VEAC’s new investigation of State forest values has been conveniently directed to report alongside the completion of the FIT process during February 2017. It is not too hard to imagine where this is headed – if the FIT process doesn’t lead to new national parks, then surely the VEAC process will. Indeed VEAC have never conducted a public land assessment that didn’t result in new parks or reserves.

VEAC lost considerable credibility over its River Red Gum Forests Investigation from 2005-08. It is clearly unable to fully investigate issues objectively from first-principles, but is directed by its political master to fashion ‘investigations’ to create outcomes which provide an aura of academic support for pre-ordained policy directions. This was evident from its determination to dismiss local concerns, including those of three Shire Councils who were part of consortium of 25 community groups which expended voluntary and paid effort valued at $0.5 million in suggesting alternative ways forward and community-acceptable compromises which VEAC simply ignored without explanation.

Advertisement

It seems that the Victorian Government is determined to declare unwanted and unwarranted new national parks although questions remain about where and to what extent they will hit the social and economic bottom line of Victoria’s rural and regional communities.

Lately there has been much hand-wringing amongst the intelligensia as to why so many voters could become sufficiently disillusioned with conventional politics that they could rush to support maverick candidates such as Hanson in Australia and Trump in the US. Those who profess to be bewildered by this phenomenum should visit regional and rural communities rendered powerless by the determination of urban-centric Governments to ignore sensible local concerns to prosecute a political ideology which largely conflates environmental awareness with myths and half-truths promulgated mainly by arms-length activists with limited in-depth understanding of the issues.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Poynter is a professional forester with 40 years experience. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Foresters of Australia and his book Going Green: Forests, fire, and a flawed conservation culture, was published by Connor Court in July 2018.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Poynter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mark Poynter
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy