Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Mental handcuffs and South Australia's economic future

By Malcolm King - posted Wednesday, 26 October 2016


Much of South Australia's media operates like the propaganda wings of the British press in World War One. Massive losses on the battlefield were portrayed as 'strategic withdrawals'. The British and Dominion casualty figures were rarely reported. Enemy casualty figures were inflated.

South Australia is facing its own bloody battles, akin in economic scale to the disaster at Passchendaele in 1917. Apart from InDaily and the ABC, Adelaide's media have failed to disclose the true number of unemployed, under employed (which is why household incomes are tanking) and workforce 'dropouts' - mainly men 45 years and over, hit by recruiter age prejudice.

Why? Because news management and their clients are desperate to booster business confidence and give what's left of their predominantly propertied and ageing audience and readers, the 'perception' that all is well. As the mainstream media amuses its self to death, thousands of men are losing their jobs in Whyalla, Port Augusta and Adelaide's northern, southern and western suburbs.

Advertisement

While the media shapes perceptions, many South Australians in their 60s and 70s believe the future will be like the past. From the mid 1950s until the late 1980s, the SA economy did well, riding on manufacturing and agriculture. This 'relaxed and comfortable' attitude, when coupled with a 'truth deficit' in local reporting, has forged a false sense of security or worse, apathy.

Once Holden closes in 2017, between 10,000-15,000 men and women will lose their jobs as 70 per cent of the automotive supply chain and supporting tiers crumbles. The good news is that some engineering businesses are converting their plants to make new products. In the next five years, another 40,000 jobs in traditional blue and white collar jobs will go as the state economy shrinks. The future of employment in SA will be short term, casual contracts.

In a world where the word 'crisis' is used to describe a fall in TV viewer ratings, in a state where bogus burst water main stories make the front page, there is no more pressing issue than jobs.

No Place like Home

Perception rests on attitudes, like a dog sitting on his tucker box. One of the most endearing defences of this appalling state of affairs is a cliché. The term 'there's no place like home' (NPLH) has considerable resonance in Adelaide and it's a truism – unless of course you don't have a job and can't pay the rent or mortgage.

Home is where fresh fish simmer in a pan and Coopers ale is sunk on an ebb tide of Lutheran suspicion of artifice and ceremony. There's an appreciation that either God or geography has provided the state with clean white beaches, great wines and fresh fruit.

Advertisement

This has strong emotional appeal and has been used by governments from time immemorial, to get men to fight wars or to pacify doubts on the home front. The technique is used by The Advertiser and Tourism SA to show how fortunate Adelaideans really are. NPLH stories are often run with nostalgia stories. Nostalgia, parochialism and the anti-competitive and protectionist, Buy SA campaign are the sand in the gearbox of progress.

That's someone else's problem

While working class people in Adelaide's blue collar suburbs are fighting for jobs and to keep their families together, citizens in Adelaide's affluent eastern suburbs are suffering from 'cul-de-sac' thinking. The main symptom, usually displayed over a glass of chardonnay, is that pending economic disasters are always someone else's problem. This dead end thinking is unfortunate because failing economies create two interconnected maladies.

The first is that as unemployment climbs and the supply chains begin to crumble, they take with them senior managers and a whole raft of white-collar administrators. The networked nature of the modern economy means that a factory closing in the city's north, south or west, spells serious problems for the company that supplied them with legal or accounting services in Parkside, Kensington or Burnside. Before you know it, there are less BMWs in the car park. That won't be reported either.

The second malady is falling property prices. The property market lives on perceptions. All the spin in the world won't entice local or interstate buyers to snap up your 'delightful, sunny three bedroom blue stone cottage in cosmopolitan Norwood', if the prospective buyer knows the economy is going to hell in a hand basket. Fear is a terrible turn off.

Would you like some incrementalism with that?

One of the reasons why South Australians haven't over thrown the Weatherill Government or taken more drastic action is incrementalism. While there were headlines when Holden, Ford and Toyota planned to closed down, there were few stories on small businesses who employ six or seven people going bust.

There is an old saying in journalism that if it wasn't reported, it didn't happen. But the harsh reality of seven people losing their jobs means that another 20 or more members of their family – and especially children - were also hit hard. It's the SME sector that is being clobbered and it's this sector which is the life blood of South Australia.

The decline of the SA economy is death by thousands of job cuts. The state will survive but at what cost to future generations?

The battle of Passchendaele was a disaster for the ANZACs because the British commanders lacked the proper intelligence about enemy forces. In South Australia the enemy is rising unemployment and under employment and the fear and hopelessness it engenders. The enemy is being aided and abetted by those in positions of power who seek to suppress the truth from the public. Name and shame them. The future of the state depends on it.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm King is a journalist and professional writer. He was an associate director at DEEWR Labour Market Strategy in Canberra and the senior communications strategist at Carnegie Mellon University in Adelaide. He runs a writing business called Republic.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm King

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy