Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Third Way Part Way

By Graham Young - posted Sunday, 15 August 1999


Bizarrely he laments the equal pay case, because it meant that stations could no longer employ aboriginal stockmen for food, tobacco and shelter, so they were sacked. He suggests that perhaps governments of the day should have paid the dole to the station owners so that they could continue to employ the aborigines.

Pearson draws a distinction between what he calls "real" economies – traditional hunter-gatherer and modern market ones - and "false" economies – welfare dependency. While he is right to decry welfare dependency, it never seems to strike him that working for unemployment benefits only goes partway to a "real" economy.

Some of this blindness is caused by Pearson’s attachment to his land. The reason that Aborigines on the settlements are paid "sit down" money is that there is little employment there. While the land is capable of supporting subsistence living, it is not capable of providing the riches sufficient to supply health and mortality comparable to the rest of Australia, let alone the mod cons that we all take for granted. Aboriginal self-sufficiency must involve a migration of a great part of the population to the fertile grounds of the cities leaving the sacred sites behind.

Advertisement

Collectivism is the basis of Aboriginal society, so it is no wonder that Pearson envisages government money being given to Aboriginal bodies who then dole it out, but again that represents an impediment to achieving a "real" economy. Absent from the accounts of both Latham and Pearson was any discussion of how economic wealth could actually be generated in the dependant societies they talked about, yet without earned economic wealth, deprivation and disempowerment will persist.

At the end of the speeches I had a vision of Pearson and Latham, like a couple of bull mastiffs, circling round and round the same bush, giving it an occasional nudge, but never quite having the confidence to put their noses in. The Third Way is a good start, but it has a long way to go.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young
Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy