Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Judges should rule on law and facts, not feelings

By Gary Johns - posted Thursday, 25 February 2016


More important, indulging victimhood opens the court to game-playing. Recently, the Family Court heard a dispute between an Aboriginal parent and a non-Aboriginal parent over custody.

The Aboriginal father had significant problems with alcohol and violence, and was verbally and emotionally abusive to the mother. Nevertheless, the judge was bound to consider the father's desire to "immerse" his child in Aboriginal culture.

The difficulty for the judge was that the Aboriginal father was not the only contender in the culture war. The mother was Irish Catholic and wished to return to Ireland with the child.

Advertisement

Until the father was about 19, he, his parents, their extended families and siblings were identified, and self-identified, as Anglo-Australians.

None of his relatives was identified by the community or claimed to be Aboriginal.

When the father was about 19, his paternal grandmother told him she was Aboriginal.

The revelation "commenced a process of self-discovery on the part of the father" and he began to identify as Aboriginal.

The mother observed that "I have never witnessed anything that suggests to me that he adheres to or practises anything inside that culture outside of his employment (at a university)."

The judge decided that, "on balance, I am satisfied the child is Aboriginal", and then went on, "so that it is clear, I am also satisfied the child is Irish".

Advertisement

The Aboriginal father was not satisfied that his heritage had been given sufficient weight and appealed (Sheldon & Weir 2011). He asserted that the trial judge had been prejudiced against him.

The grounds were that the trial judge had asked: "Does (the ­father) have as part of his DNA … a link to his Australian indigenous origins?

''I mean, it is plain that (the father) is notably fair, so presumably he has DNA connection into non-indigenous origins as well?"

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This article was first published in The Australian.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

33 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Gary Johns is a former federal member of Parliament and served as a minister in the Keating Government. Since December 2017 he has been the commissioner of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Gary Johns

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Gary Johns
Article Tools
Comment 33 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy