Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Religion's dying swan act: secularism is banishing it from the public square

By Max Wallace - posted Tuesday, 5 January 2016


However, I suggest the public square argument is really a cri de coeur concerning religion's decline in the West which is demonstrated by

  • religion's steady decline in terms of memberships and church attendances; as an idea in the public mind, expressed in the census figures, religion's ship is slowly but surely sinking.
  • religion's overall inability to prevent social reforms that tend to undermine religion through their secularising effect

On the first point, the August 2016 census will show us just how low religion has sunk in Australia when – for the first time – citizens are asked up front whether they have a religion or not, and, if so, what it is.

Advertisement

Unlike the 2013 New Zealand census where Christianity has slumped to somewhere between 49 and 42 per cent (NZ citizens can tick more than one box for religious affiliation) the Australian census has for decades concealed the 'no religion' option at the bottom of the religion question under a checklist of religion options. The result of shifting it to the top of the question will be an interesting exercise.

There is now a good reason why politicians, in particular, soft-peddle on their religious beliefs. The first is that electorally, it can be a kiss of death. Disinterested citizens don't want to be preached to.

Our 2015 IPSOS survey (Russell Blackford, 'Most Australian voters are not influenced by religion', The Conversation, 13 September, 2015) found that 86 per cent of Australians do not take religion into consideration when they vote; 26 per cent said the question had no application to them; 60 per cent said religion did not influence them at all; 14 per cent said they were 'somewhat influenced'. Only 5 per cent said they were 'very much influenced'.

On the second point, by way of evidence, here is a list of social initiatives and reforms achieved in spite of conservative church opposition since the 1870s:

  • the creation of free, secular and compulsory public schools
  • the opening of museums, public libraries and later sports activities and shops on Sundays
  • the end of prohibition and the extension of the opening hours of hotels and clubs selling alcohol, later extended to seven days a week
  • new no-fault divorce laws
  • the lowering of the age of consent
  • legislation to allow civil celebrants
  • sex before marriage and the widespread use of oral contraceptives
  • the common law compromise concerning abortion, the acceptance of a woman's right to choose and later the decriminalisation of abortion in some states
  • the legalisation of homosexuality
  • the right of lesbian women to IVF and more liberal approaches to gay adoption
  • a loosening of the laws concerning blasphemy and censorship
  • the extension of horse racing into night time meetings

A case study of these battles was the Western Australian parliament of 2002 which introduced gay and prostitution law reforms, and eased off on prohibiting abortion.

Advertisement

In a useful review of what happened, journalist Steve Pennells ('Pulpit Politics',West Australian 14 September 2002) wrote the politicians had been ' … intimidated, threatened, blacklisted and defamed in a coordinated set of campaigns aimed at influencing the state's political decisions'.

He cited Liberal MP Arthur Marshall who said ' It was intense – it was the force of religion against the force of free thought. It got very spiky and it got very personal. There were people crying in the Assembly.'

The reforms all got through. Another WA MP, John Quigley, openly Catholic, said what theocrats don't want to hear: 'Once you are in public service you are not there to pass criminal laws to outlaw behaviours because the Catholic Church agrees or disagrees with it.'

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

31 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Max Wallace is vice-president of the Rationalists Assn of NSW and a council member of the New Zealand Assn of Rationalists and Humanists.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Max Wallace

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 31 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy