Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

How to predict the 2001 federal election outcome (maybe)

By Justin Wolfers and Andrew Leigh - posted Sunday, 30 September 2001


Finally, we turn to the bookies and the punters. Under Northern Territory law, bookies are allowed to take bets on a range of non-sporting events, including elections. This has given us a new source of data for predicting election outcomes. Their accuracy is based on the assumption that when we are asked to put our money where our mouth is, it is likely that we think long and hard about all dimensions of the government’s performance.

According to Centrebet, Australia’s largest online bookmaker, Beazley has been a solid favourite all year. At one point Beazley was posted at odds of 7/2 on – shorter odds than Phar Lap in the 1930 Melbourne Cup. Even at those skinny odds, Centrebet sportsbook manager Gerard Daffy found that "most bets have been for Labor", with one Victorian punter putting $50,000 on Beazley.

Indeed, betting market fluctuations over the past two years tell a more nuanced story than either the polling results or the economic indicators. This election appears to have been Howard's to lose. The Liberal Party opened a strong odds-on favorite, but their odds have drifted out significantly since. While Howard's polling numbers slid south some time ago, the punters only really reacted in the wake of the Western Australian and Queensland elections. This slide has also coincided with ongoing concern about the GST, and the deterioration in the economic outlook.

Advertisement

Following the Tampa incident however, the punters reacted before the polls, and Howard has been all the rage, attracting two bets of $10,000 amid other large wagers. In a remarkably even betting contest, Centrebet are now offering a return of $1.75 for every dollar wagered on Beazley, and $1.95 for Howard-supporters. This suggests that Labor rates about a 55% chance of winning the election.

Daffy rates the betting markets as the most accurate barometer of the electorate, and he reads them as pointing squarely in the direction of Labor, who have been "backed for bundles". He notes that the federal election "will be the single biggest betting event this year - bigger than either the ARL or NRL grand final." After all, he points out, "it is an 'event' that everybody has a vested interest in." But before you rush to cast your bet, it is worth noting that in 1993, Hewson lost as a short-priced favourite.

Each of the three ways of forecasting elections point to a close election. While last week’s polls are pointing to Howard, recent events make these numbers difficult to interpret. Looking at "fundamentals", the softening economy suggest that Howard is in trouble, and on this point, the betting market suggests that the punters concur. Pollsters, economists or punters – who do you trust?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

An edited version of this article appeared in the Sydney Morning Herald on September 29, 2001.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Dr Justin Wolfers is an Assistant Professor of Economics at Business and Public Policy Department of the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Andrew Leigh is the member for Fraser (ACT). Prior to his election in 2010, he was a professor in the Research School of Economics at the Australian National University, and has previously worked as associate to Justice Michael Kirby of the High Court of Australia, a lawyer for Clifford Chance (London), and a researcher for the Progressive Policy Institute (Washington DC). He holds a PhD from Harvard University and has published three books and over 50 journal articles. His books include Disconnected (2010), Battlers and Billionaires (2013) and The Economics of Just About Everything (2014).

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Justin Wolfers
All articles by Andrew Leigh
Related Links
Andrew Leigh's Web page
Justin Wolfers's Web page
Photo of Justin WolfersJustin WolfersPhoto of Andrew LeighAndrew Leigh
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy