Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Under new management; we'll be with you shortly

By Tom Lucas - posted Monday, 11 November 2013


Which of the policies of the Labor or the Coalition governments is correct is not being debated in this piece. The point is transparency. Why are we now being left out of the loop?

AusAID, responsible for managing Australia's overseas aid (now absorbed into DFAT) is being watched closely since announcement of the cutting of $4.5b in foreign aid over four years, an initiative headed by Julie Bishop. In late October, the transparency organisation 'Publish What You Fund' released it's 2013 Aid Transparency Index and gave AusAID a score of 43% for its 'access to relevant, timely and useable information'. Not terrible, but definitely not what most would call transparent.

Even within the government confines, ministers must seek approval from the Prime Minister's office before addressing the media. Understandably, there is a party line to which ministers should be expected to adhere, but don't the members of parliament represent the people of their respective electorates and speak for them, not the office of the PM?

Advertisement

As for the country's economic circumstances of late, in Mr. Abbott's budget reply speech of May 2013, he declared a budget emergency. Now in office, not once has the term been used and the words 'budget deterioration' are coming up instead. I for one am impressed that the 'emergency' is now over before parliament has even had its first sitting.

Federal government, especially in the lucky country like Australia should be the inspirational body to which people turn, not one that inculcates fear during election campaigns, and leaves people in a daze while left with more questions than answers when words like national emergency are thrown about.

Australia is under new management, but where is the emergency? Where is the crisis? Well, if you leave a message, someone might get back to you.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tom Lucas (BAppSc, DipBus, DipMgt) is a geoscientist.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tom Lucas

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy