Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Climate Catch 22: big bucks, big bets and big mess

By Michael Kile - posted Monday, 16 September 2013


“Just as a guide, if you divide the globe into one degree-by- one degree cells – about 65,000 cells – and you run it out for 100 years, it means 40,000,000,000,000,000 calculations.

 “The second problem is we create lots of data. For AR4 in 2007 it was 35 terabytes. For AR5, it is about 30 petabytes. That’s getting to be really seriously worrying. For the next IPCC report, we are not quite clear how we are going to cope with it.”

“Here’s our third problem. We have a big demand for people. We desperately need people who can manage million-line versions of computer code, or learn how to slice-and-dice 50 pedabytes of data...Somehow, we have to bring lots more people through with those skills (41.20mins)

Advertisement

It takes a full-scale system now to hope to cope with the scale climate science demands of its science and what policy-makers and the public demand of the climate scientists. It is no longer a thing two or three people sitting in their offices can get away with doing.

What we really need is lot more kids getting into science and technology to solve the problems my generation is leaving them with. If we lose another generation to lawyers and accountants, we will seriously struggle to stay up to speed in these areas in the future.”

The orthodoxy had to lift its game too, for:

“the demands coming from the impact and adaptation communities to give them the information they need, puts immense pressure on the climate scientists to do what they have been doing much, much better and cleverer in the future” (48.23min.).

 When Pitman mentioned the 40,000,000,000,000,000 calculations, my head started spinning. What if there was a glitch and just one of them was wrong? What about all the dummy variables and assumptions in his 65,000 cells and so on?

Climate Catch-22 Syndrome (CCS) hit me half-way home, when I heard a voice. It was not the one that spoke to Apostle John in The Cave of the Apocalypse. The voice I heard was that of B-25 bombardier, Captain John Yossarian:

Advertisement

“There was only one catch and that was Catch-22...He would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he were sane he had to fly them” (Catch-22, p. 56, ch. 5).

For me, CCS arises whenever empirical data confirming cooling is proposed as evidence for – or “is consistent with” - warming, when no amount of contrary evidence can overturn the DAGW paradigm, when “missing” heat hides in the deep ocean, when guesstimates morph into predictions and so on.

One climate scientist, clearly suffering from CCS too, concluded that any “finding that human influence has not contributed substantially to the magnitude of a particular EWE may not be incompatible with a finding that human influence substantially altered the odds of such an event happening (especially a particular threshold exceedence).” Catch-22.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Michael Kile is author of No Room at Nature's Mighty Feast: Reflections on the Growth of Humankind. He has an MSc degree from Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London and a Diploma from the College. He also has a BSc (Hons) degree in geology and geophysics from the University of Tasmania and a BA from the University of Western Australia. He is co-author of a recent paper on ancient Mesoamerica, Re-interpreting Codex Cihuacoatl: New Evidence for Climate Change Mitigation by Human Sacrifice, and author of The Aztec solution to climate change.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Michael Kile

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy