Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

NDIS: a new way or more of the same?

By David Heckendorf - posted Thursday, 18 April 2013


The issue I have with the NDIS services being provided by any of these types of large poverty fighting enterprises is that people with significant disabilities will be at risk of being devalued as a consequence: this is the risk of association principle.

If such entities are relied upon to provide services to these NDIS services, there is a significant risk that people with significant disabilities could face further devaluation as being seen as a client of a service who works with a range of other devalued, disempowered and stigmatised sectors of the community.

Should we be in a position where substantial government contracts have been finalised for these charities to provide these NDIS services, I would suggest that these fortunate entities should do all that is reasonably possible to distance this type of work from its main operations. This would mean branding its services in such away that does not draw attention to its other work and perhaps even establishing separate legal entities for these contracts.

Advertisement

One finally concern that I have is the religious bases for some of these charities. In an ever increasing secular culture such as Australia in which there are also a number of different faiths, a major contractor with one particular faith may unfairly influence people with disabilities’ choices to participate and to enjoy the lifestyles that they choose. And, this is a core principle of both the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Heckendorf has profound Cerebral Palsy, which affects his physical ability to care for himself. Notwithstanding these limitations he holds a Masters of Laws Degree from the Australian National University and has in excess of a decade employment experience within the Australian and ACT Public Service. The opinions he expresses are his own.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Heckendorf

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy