Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Lessons from America

By Rodney Croome - posted Friday, 16 November 2012


Australia saw first-hand that same-sex couples share these values when recent Big Brother winner, Ben Norris, proposed to his fiancé on national TV with these words:

This was a diamond that my great grandfather bought for my great grandmother and it was worn by my parents on their wedding day so it's something that is a part of my family. Since I've met Ben all I have wanted is for him to be a part of my family.

Earlier this year Australian Marriage Equality shifted its advocacy focus to the link between marriage and family. There was a similar focus in the narrowly defeated campaign for same-sex marriage in Tasmania.

Advertisement

The task ahead is to re-orient the Australian marriage equality conversation so we are talking about why marriage matters at least as much as why equality matters.

What the U.S. election result doesn't mean for the Australian marriage equality movement is that we should aim for an Australian referendum. In the words of leading American marriage equality advocate, Evan Wolfson:

Rights should not be put to a vote. While we have now shown we can do it, it doesn't mean that we should have to do it, and it doesn't mean that it is easy to do.

Since 2009 the number of federal representatives who are prepared to vote for marriage equality has increased ten-fold from six to 68, and will increase far more when the Coalition allows a conscience vote.

The ACT, South Australia, NSW and Tasmania will move forward with relevant legislation in the near future, and as soon as one jurisdiction achieves equality the push will accelerate elsewhere. Legislative reform remains Australia's best path to marriage equality.

Finally, what does the U.S. election mean for those Australians who are conflicted about marriage equality or who oppose it?

Advertisement

The U.S. election shows that the historical trend is clearly towards marriage equality. Given this, there seems to be no point prolonging the inevitable outcome, and dividing the nation in the process. Opposition to marriage equality is a losing cause that simply diverts attention from other pressing issues.

Now is a time for those not on the side of equality to reflect on whether they really want to drag this debate out until marriage equality is eventually achieved or whether they will sensibly and graciously allow the issue to be resolved as soon as possible.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rodney Croome is a spokesperson for Equality Tasmania and national advocacy group, just.equal. He who was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 2003 for his LGBTI advocacy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rodney Croome

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy