Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

What would Jesus say?

By Michael Hewitt-Gleeson - posted Thursday, 15 November 2012


I would like to propose a thought experiment: Just suppose there was a TV debate tonight between Jesus and the Archbishop of Melbourne. The topic of the day is: Do you endorse the Melbourne Response to child abuse by the Catholic Church?'

Why bother? What is the purpose of this thought experiment? Many people are now saying that the Catholic Church of Melbourne has lost its moral authority because it no longer represents the views of its founder, Jesus. The purpose of this thought experiment is to allow you to do some fresh thinking to see if this is claim is valid.

Background notes: In The Age last Friday (September 21) Religious Editor Barney Swartz wrote, "The Catholic Church in Victoria today admitted that it had upheld 620 cases of criminal child abuse by clergy in the past 16 years".

Advertisement

Here's my transcript of the imagined debate between Jesus and the Archbishop. Let us begin the debate with the first question to be put to both Jesus and the church leader by the Moderator. By the way, I'm not making this all up. It is well-researched in biblical and contemporary records. In this debate all statements made by Jesus and the Archbishop will be based on their direct quotes from the written record and referenced in each quote.
________________________________________

MODERATOR: Archbishop, in your submission to the Victorian Government's parliamentary inquiry into your church's handling of child abuse you say your response was an independent investigation, ongoing counseling and support, plus compensation which you called, the Melbourne Response.

ARCHBISHOP: Yes. We call that The Melbourne Response.

MODERATOR: Did the Melbourne Response include transparency or were victims required to sign confidentiality agreements.

ARCHBISHOP: Well, many of them did sign confidentially agreements but we've now waived them for this parliamentary inquiry.

MODERATOR: That's nice. So my first question to you Archbishop is: Did you endorse the Melbourne Response?

Advertisement

ARCHBISHOP: Yes, I did endorse it and authorised it to be used on many occasions.

MODERATOR: Whom do you consider to be the founder of your church?

ARCHBISHOP: It is well known that Jesus is not only the founder of the church I administer in his name but that I proclaim him also to be My Lord.

MODERATOR: OK. I will now turn to you, Jesus, for your viewpoint. So many words have been put in your mouth by so many people. When we look at the vast multi-billion dollar global Jesus industry we can see so many vested financial and power-based interests that we can be forgiven for wondering what your real point-of-view is. The big problem has always been that you, Jesus, left no account of your life or your teachings in your own hand. Your sayings, which you spoke in Aramaic, had to wait for many years to be written down in Greek and Latin. What we have to go on was recorded by your disciples and your disciples' disciples so we can only make educated guesses about the accuracy of your sayings after their subsequent translation and editing. Do you see our problem?

JESUS: Yes, of course, I do.

MODERATOR: OK. Now let us proceed to the issue of child abuse and the Melbourne Response. I will now put the question to Jesus. Do you endorse the Archbishop's approach to child abuse of an independent investigation, counseling plus confidential compensation?

JESUS: No, I have never said that I would endorse such an approach

MODERATOR: Well, can you tell us what you have said?

JESUS: This is a subject on which I really have had a lot to say. You will not have to stretch a point to understand my views about the value of children. I have given very clear instructions to my followers. The Archbishop and his predecessors have squandered my reputation and that of the church by their procrastinations, dissembling and shortcomings on this real issue which is so close to my heart.

MODERATOR: You seem very passionate about child abuse.

JESUS: Well aren't we all? Sadly, my bishops have chosen to ignore the authority I have expressly given them about children and their abusers.

MODERATOR: What have you said about this issue?

JESUS: One day I was teaching my apostles. These were the first bishops–my own bishops whom I personally appointed. They were curious about rank and precedence in Heaven. Naturally, they wanted to know whom I thought would secure the most favourable positions in Heaven and I suppose they may even have been thinking of themselves. They kept asking me about who would be the VIPs? Who'd get to be in the inner sanctum? Who would be given the best positions? Who would sit closest to the Father Himself? They were all ears and I had their full attention. I saw this as a good opportunity to assert my authority. So, I didn't avoid the subject but I embraced it and in no uncertain terms. I spoke to my bishops ex cathedra giving them one of my core teachings. Later these teachings were recounted first by Matthew and then corroborated by Mark and Luke. I saw a little kid watching me so I called him over and sat the kid in the middle of them all and then I taught them the following important lesson and I quote: Listen! I'm telling you disciples the truth now. Unless you change and become like little kids, YOU won't ever be getting into the kingdom of Heaven. Therefore, whoever makes himself as little as this little kid, he's the one who is greatest in the kingdom of Heaven. And anyone who welcomes one little kid like this one, in my name, also welcomes me.

MODERATOR: What did you say about the abuse of children? And, in particular, what did you say about the abuse of children that follow your group?

JESUS: Well, here I became most passionate and I tried to deliver my teaching by using the strongest possible language in this teaching. I said to them, quote: But if anyone is the downfall of one of these little kids who believes in me, it were better for him that he drowned in the deep of the sea with a great millstone tied round his neck.

MODERATOR: Did you really say that?

JESUS: Yes, I am on the record in Matthew, Mark and Luke in the New Jerusalem Bible which is the official Vatican version of the Bible.

MODERATOR: Child abuse can be emotional, physical or sexual and there have always been abusers of children. What else did you tell them?

JESUS: I said: It's a great pity for the world that there should be such causes of kids falling. Causes of falling indeed there must be, but pity help anyone who provides them!

MODERATOR: Did you prescribe any preventative measures?

JESUS: Certainly. I was most animated on the topic. I said: If your hand or your foot should be your downfall, cut it off and throw it away: it is better for you to enter into life crippled or lame, than to have two hands or two feet and be thrown into eternal fire.

MODERATOR: What about those, like your bishops, in positions of responsibility for the protection of children? What about those who just turned a blind eye to the problem?

JESUS: I told them the following: And if your eye should be your downfall, tear it out and throw it away: it is better for you to enter into life with one eye, than to have two eyes and be thrown into the hell of fire.

MODERATOR: What about consequences from Heaven? Are those who have abused children likely to go undetected? Are those who have failed to protect children in their care likely to get away with it?

JESUS: Well, what do you think? I went on to say: See that you never despise any of these little ones, for I tell you that their angels in heaven are continually in the presence of my Father in Heaven.

MODERATOR: Archbishop over to you. Recently you have had to face these issues in your own archdiocese. You have just now submitted a damning report you call Facing The Truth to the parliamentary enquiry where you admit for the first time that there are not merely a few cases of child abuse but hundreds–maybe as many as 620 children who have been abused.

This report has exposed the organized and institutional abuse of many children. You have heard what your founder has had to say, Archbishop, so what can you now report to Jesus that you will do about your Melbourne Response.

ARCHBISHOP: I will wait to see what the Victorian Government says and then I'll have further discussions with my legal advisers.

MODERATOR: Jesus, are you satisfied with this response?

JESUS: What do you think?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This article was first published in an extended form on School of Thinking



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

54 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Michael Hewitt-Gleeson is a Melbourne-based writer who blogs at School of Thinking

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Michael Hewitt-Gleeson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 54 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy