Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia must set-up new migrants and refugees to succeed

By Teresa Gambaro - posted Monday, 8 October 2012


Australia is arguably the world's most successful immigration nation. But, if we are to build on that proud heritage, we need to ensure our settlement services set new migrants and refugees up to succeed not to fail.

Since WWII, immigration has transformed Australia from a nation of some seven million to one of more than 22 million people with more than 260 different cultural backgrounds. In that time, immigration has seen more than seven million people settle here, including almost 750,000 refugees.

There can be no dispute that immigration has made Australia the nation we know today. It has made us a stronger Australia.

Advertisement

I am proud to say that I share in this migrant heritage being born to Italian immigrant parents who owned and operated the local corner store and worked hard to develop their business and support their family.

Regrettably though Labor's appalling border protection policy failures run the risk of polarising Australian society and unravelling these successes.

As at the end of September this year, under the soft border protection policies of this Labor Government, 442 boats and more 26,000 people have been allowed to arrive illegally by boat.

In September itself, 2,355 people turned up on 35 boats in 30 days. This compares with 34 boats and 1,969 people in August and 31 boats and 1,828 people in July.

Under John Howard's successful polices there was an average of just 45 people turning up every year, over six years. On this standard, we have now had more than fifty years of boat arrivals in just one month.

On a calendar year basis, 11,409 people have turned up on 170 boats in 2012, in the first nine months of the year. At the average rate of arrivals under the Howard Government's full suite of policies, it would take more than 250 years to reach this same result.

Advertisement

Beyond the catastrophic loss of life and inability to discourage people smugglers, Labor's border protection failures also equate to a $4.9 billion budget blow out since 2009/10. This blow out does not include the additional $1.3 billion required to increase Australia's refugee and humanitarian intake to 20,000 (up from 13,750) as part of the Houston Report's recommendations.

The astronomical cost impacts flowing from Labor's horrendous border protection policy failures means we need to urgently focus attention on delivering settlement services for new migrants and refugees that produce sustained positive outcomes. And somehow we have to do that with $4.9 billion less in the Budget.

Dramatic spending increases should not be seen as the best or the only response as to how we as a nation meet this challenge.

In addition to Labor's border protection failures, gross inefficiencies in the management of the migrant and refugee settlement program have placed unbearable pressure on settlement service providers throughout Australia.

A telling example of Labor's bureaucratic, one-size-fits-all approach can be seen in its delivery of English language services. In Australia, the primary vehicle for the delivery of these services to new migrants and refugees is the Adult Migrant English Program (AMEP).

Language skills are universally acknowledged throughout the world as being the crucial core component of positive settlement outcomes. As such, one would expect that Australia's settlement services programs for new migrants and refugees would be geared towards delivering outcomes that result in high levels of literacy.

So, how does Australia perform in this space?

In 2012/13, the AMEP will cost the Australian taxpayer more than $220 million – that's not a small number in anyone's language.

During Senate Estimates in February this year, under pressure from the Coalition, Labor was forced to admit that in 2010/11, 54 per cent of AMEP participants who were issued with certificates did not have functional English proficiency. A further 14 per cent of participants were issued with certificates of completion just for turning up. It is beyond me as to how anyone could consider a 68 per cent failure rate for a $220 million program even remotely acceptable. But, then again this should not be considered a surprise from a government that brought us pink batts and the fiasco that was Building an Education Revolution.

Poor language skills produce poor employment outcomes. Poor employment outcomes trap new migrants in welfare dependency and reinforce a sense of failure not just for new migrants and refuges themselves, but also in the wider Australian community which then in turn creates pressures on social cohesion.

Apart from its $220 million price tag, what is most galling about the extremely poor results being produced by the AMEP program is that while Labor is well aware of the consequential negative flow on effects from such a diabolically underperforming program it still persists with the same clunky template approach to service delivery.

The employment impacts of these failures were made clear to Labor in the Department of Immigration and Department of Immigration and Citizenship's own report, Settlement Outcomes for New Arrivals 2011, which found that 83.5 per cent of refugees were still on some form of Centreline benefit more than five years after arrival in this country.

Labor's lack of innovation in the settlement services space and its apparent inability to recognise the diverse needs of the different cultural backgrounds of new migrants and refugees to Australia has resulted in what are clearly less than acceptable outcomes.

While I say that Australia is arguably the world's most successful immigration nation, our success is not something we should take for granted nor should we be misguided about the reasons for our successes thus far.

Australia in 2012 is not the Australia of the 1950s. It's not the same Australia in which my parents arrived and worked their way to success. Australia is still the land of the fair go, but opportunities will only be realised by those who have a go. Our most successful immigrants have always understood, appreciated and celebrated this about Australia. It is this spirit of inclusiveness, participation and having a go that has made Australia great and will ensure we remain great into the future. This is why as a nation we must find ways to assist new migrants and refugees to succeed, to help them participate and contribute to Australian society – trapping them in welfare dependency as Labor seems content to do is not the way forward.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

21 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Teresa Gambaro is the Federal Member for Brisbane and Chair of the Joint Standing Committee for Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Teresa Gambaro

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 21 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy