Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Gay marriage: an argument against

By Peter Sellick - posted Wednesday, 1 August 2012


While we have no idea of the biology or the psychology of sexual orientation we do know that it is deeply rooted and not amenable to manipulation. In other words it is gifted in the same way that being hetero is gifted.

The gift makes them different, they cannot look forward to generating children out of their love. They need a third person to produce a family.

This is an important difference that cannot be erased by in-vitro fertilization even though healthy and well cared for children may result. It is the fundamental reason that gay relationships may be approved of and blessed but may not be equated with traditional marriage.

Advertisement

To do so is to ignore difference for the sake of fairness.

I think gays should give up on marriage and live out the freedom that has been gained for them. Being free of raising a family enables men and women to focus on pursuits that would be impossible when locked into the necessities of economics and location that come with raising a family in a similar way that the Roman church has benefited from celibate clergy, but without the loneliness.

This freedom must have been important in allowing the great gay artists and writers and dramatists and poets to have the flexibility and freedom to create so many works that enrich us.

While I am not sure of gay pride, pride being a sin, if gays have pride in being gay, then why do they want to mimic traditional marriage between straights? It will always sit badly for the reasons outlined above.

Why do they want to erase the one obvious difference between them and the straight population? My hunch is that the language of human rights, that is often not useful in these cases, plus the ideology of equalitarianism pushes both straights and gays to a total erasure of the difference and they will only be content when this has been achieved.

This will mean that the terms "husband" and "wife" will be swallowed up in political correctness and our language will again be reduced by the idea that we are all the same.

Advertisement

My message for gays? That traditional marriage is not for you is not an insult or an example of discrimination but a recognition of real difference that you faced when you first came out. That difference will not be submerged in traditional marriage. It is valuable; Give thanks.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

91 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Sellick an Anglican deacon working in Perth with a background in the biological sciences.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Sellick

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter Sellick
Article Tools
Comment 91 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy