Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The Occupy movement – wrong target.

By Justin Jefferson - posted Wednesday, 2 November 2011


Stock markets also provide a way to combine the factors of production so as to find out which ways of using scarce resources best satisfy the wants of the 99 percent, as judged by the 99 percent. This process is essentially similar to a farmer deciding how best to use his farm to produce food. Should he sow by hand or use a tractor, and if so what kind? Should he grow wheat, or raise lambs, to sell in one year, or grow apples to sell in five years? Should he do a repair himself or contract it out? The function of the entrepreneur is to decide what to produce, and how to combine the factors of production. The main difference between a stock market and a single producer is that the stock market involves large numbers of people who don’t know each other, co-operating to decide how to allocate resources as between a large variety of competing demands, in constantly changing conditions.

Competition is a discovery procedure. If we already knew who was going to win a competition, there would be no point in having it. The capitalists are entirely subject to the decisions of the consumers because if a business doesn’t provide what the masses want, it suffers losses or goes broke, and the market transfers its assets into the hands of people who will use them to serve the masses better. If a business does provide what the masses want, it makes a profit in direct proportion to the behaviour of the 99 percent in preferring that particular use of capital to other possible uses of it.

So (assuming that the Occupiers are not in favour of mass starvation) their hostility to profit, competition, and capital only shows confusion.  Without profit and loss, all production would be transformed into a corrupt and wasteful jumble – which is why no-one will advocate full socialism. Without profit and loss, resources would be withdrawn from producing what the people value as most urgent and important, and diverted into making goods more costly, and the people poorer in a massive waste worse for the environment, for the great mass of human beings, and for social justice. Instead of the distribution of wealth being decided by the 99 percent in their decisions whether to buy or abstain from buying, it could only be the result of arbitrary political favouritism and parasitism – exactly what the Occupiers are protesting against.

Advertisement

This brings us to the third function of stock markets, where the Occupiers’ criticisms are completely justified. Stock markets function to carry out government redistributive policies which work by manipulating the supply of money and credit. Markets don’t choose to carry out these policies – it happens automatically from people using money as a medium of exchange. That’s why governments do it!

Just because government policies redistribute wealth, doesn’t mean that such redistributions are fair or just. They can, and do, redistribute wealth by taking it from the masses of ordinary and poor people and giving it to big corporate cartels, billionaire bankers, foreign authoritarian governments, and the military-industrial complex.

It is not as though we give government power to manipulate the supply of money and credit – monetary policy - which can be used badly or well. These powers can only be used badly, because they cannot be exercised without giving banks a legal monopoly to monetise the debt – in other words, to make money out of government debt - and channel it straight to Wall Street.

The huge bank profits and huge government debt are not some kind of strange coincidence. They are two sides of the same coin, namely, fractional reserve banking.

Thus people are right when they smell a rat, and right to demand the abolition of such corruption. But ‘for every hundred hacking at the branches, there is only one striking the root’. The root is the central banking system itself – the Fed in America, and the Reserve Bank in Australia, and their government-created banking cartels. Granting the right to control interest rates grants a licence to print money. It works through lending “money” unbacked by deposits.  This could not happen on a free market for money and credit because it breaches the common law of fraud and of contract, and depositors would have a simple effective remedy - withdrawal. Under the current fractional reserve system it doesn’t work to protect yourself from the fraud by withdrawing your money precisely because the end of government interventions is to stop it working, by protecting the banks, and forcing everyone to foot the bill by using constantly-devaluing money. The scam works by diluting the value of the existing money stock. Everyone – especially the poorest - pays through the constantly rising prices. Government exempts itself from the law against fraud, and to do that it must protect the banks too. That’s what monetary policy is – else the supply of money and credit would be no more regulated than the supply of shirts or sandwiches.

Central banks function to spread this inflationary, bubble-making, depression-making, instant-grat, consumer debt, future-eating, war-funding disorder and injustice throughout the whole banking system: http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north86.html , and from there into the whole structure of production and morality: http://mises.org/books/moneyproduction.pdf

Advertisement

The Occupiers are right in protesting against the exploitation of the 99 percent by the one percent. But they have misidentified the one percent that’s causing the problem: http://mises.org/daily/5776/The-State-Is-the-1-Percent

Those who support government control of money and credit - whether they realise it or not - also support the gross moral, economic and social injustices that it intrinsically and necessarily causes.  The Occupiers have played right into the hands of the powers and cartels whom they complain about.

To strike the root we should all be demanding the abolition of the central banks. 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Justin Jefferson is an Australian who wishes to show that social co-operation is best and fairest when based in respect for individual freedom.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Justin Jefferson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy