Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Some potential ethical problems with the results of genetic research

By Peter Baume - posted Friday, 15 June 2001


(11) If it is so included, will subsidy be for all or only for some diseases?

These questions involve issues of equity and fairness as between people. Society has not answered similar questions well in the past – perhaps it will not get it right this time either.

(12) Who will "own" personal information derived from studying genomes?

Advertisement

(13) Will commercial interests, or society, apply coercion of any kind on the basis of genetic differences between people?

Consider an insurance company that uses risk assessment to "load" basic premiums. So if you are a smoker, you pay more. Should it happen, will it happen, that the possession of certain combinations of genes will result in higher premiums too?

There are 13 questions and they go to what we are, what our society is, and what that society and we will be.

A question you may wish to consider in depth is what the genome may mean for human longevity. For decades there has been an unspoken search for immortality, picked up in the so-called "war against cancer" or the "war against heart disease". But knowledge derived from the human genome project is likely to make human life much longer. A geneticists was quoted in a medical newspaper recently as saying:

"In theory, there is no reason why immortality couldn’t be achieved."

Foolish ultra-Cartesian thinkers believe that humans are only machines and that all one needs to do is repair or replace the parts for it to keep going indefinitely.

Advertisement

But if the balance between loss of people and replacement of people is altered, there will be more people than ever upon this globe. Will the "population explosion" get much worse? What will be the consequences of this for human reproduction? For example, will China’s "one child" policy become standard practice for all advanced societies? Or is even that restrictive policy too generous for the future? There may be nasty consequences from the possible population increase. For example, will environments degrade even faster than they do now? Will fertility have to drop even lower than it is now? Or will there be an even greater "population explosion". Do we expect that increases in food production will allow more people from wealthy countries to be fed – even if millions from less fortunate countries continue to starve? Where will people live? Where will people find enough water, or jobs, or homes – let alone enough space?

It is possible to go on, but the outline of the problem is clear. Our society will be changed in quite major ways by the knowledge that comes from the HGP.

You would think that such questions would be urgent and immediate. But those running ELSI have been concentrating on certain specific matters like insurance – important in themselves but only a small piece of the problem.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Professor Peter Baume is a former Australian politician. Baume was Professor of Community Medicine at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) from 1991 to 2000 and studied euthanasia, drug policy and evaluation. Since 2000, he has been an honorary research associate with the Social Policy Research Centre at UNSW. He was Chancellor of the Australian National University from 1994 to 2006. He has also been Commissioner of the Australian Law Reform Commission, Deputy Chair of the Australian National Council on AIDS and Foundation Chair of the Australian Sports Drug Agency. He was appointed a director of Sydney Water in 1998. Baume was appointed an Officer of the Order of Australia in January 1992 in recognition of service to the Australian Parliament and upgraded to Companion in the 2008 Queen's Birthday Honours List. He received an honorary doctorate from the Australian National University in December 2004. He is also patron of The National Forum, publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Baume
Related Links
Australian National University
Photo of Peter Baume
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy